Johann Sebastian Bach is a bright dividing line in music, in many ways similar to Thomas Aquinas in philosophy. Before, everything was one way; after, everything was different. I'm not sure why, but listening to Bach often reminds me of Aquinas - probably it's the mixture of the divinely inspired with the pure, human, creative genius that leads to a sense of astonishment that something like this could be created.
Bach is well known for his fugues - indeed, Toccata and Fugue is so well known as to be it's own Hollywood horror flick trope. But probably his greatest was the "Little" fugue in B Minor. It was called "Little" to distinguish it from the "Great" Fugue in G Minor, which was longer.
A Fugue is a piece that starts with a theme - a melody, if you will. This theme is repeated and echoed back from different "voices": singers, instruments, or organ "hands". The voices play back and forth, either expounding the theme or embellishing and accompanying it. Listening to the voices mesh and work together it is like watching the workings of a fine Swiss mechanical watch. It's intellectual entertainment that - at its best - also feeds the soul.
This is a particularly interesting performance of the Little Fugue, where the notes of the piece are shown visibly, and color coded by voice. It's almost like listening and watching the watch whir and click. It's certainly not the music that Aquinas would have heard, but since he was the smartest guy of the millennium, I expect that he would have understood the fusion of divine and mortal inspiration.
This piece is also interesting in just how influential it has been through the ages, and remains to this day. Here's Styx's version, from their album Styx II:
And if all that isn't enough, here's Toccata and Fugue:
(Image source)
9 comments:
Thank you for the Bach this morning! You are right in that mornings are for classical music!
Good music for the morning. I've got Vivaldi Four Seasons on, coffee brewing and I slept in til 10 which is about four hours later than I ussually do on a weekend. Good times.
If you haven't read "Evening in the Palace of Reason - Bach Meets Frederick the Great in the Age of Enlightenment," by all means do so. Parallel biographies culminating in Bach's invitation to Frederick's palace, where he was challenged to write a canon on a theme ill-suited to the purpose. He responded with his famous "Musical Offering."
The book is wonderfully entertaining, whether you're musically literate or not. http://www.amazon.com/Evening-Palace-Reason-Frederick-Enlightenment/dp/0007156588/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1304261983&sr=8-1
JSB was a god!
I love listening to the mathematical precision of the two and three part invesntions whilst reading the score.
Brilliant!
And, thank you.
When I was in college, I used to listen to more Bach; the precision and intricacy of the compositions seemed to help things like electromagnetics work their way into the right places in my brain.
Nothing ever worked for partial differential equations, though. I still think the Method of Frobenius is some sort of bizarre sexual technique...
One of the more interesting, if less appreciated, aspects to the Little Fugue--and you caught it when you descibed the melody lines as voices--is that despite all the complexity and layering of sounds and parts, no more than four notes ever play at the same moment. You could perform this piece with voices: a soprano, alto, tenor, and bass could sing this perfectly. There is no need for a fifth voice.
Graybeard, LOL
Annual Open House at the National Cathedral, many people walking and talking. Organist hit the opening chord of The Great Fugue and everyone stopped for 8 minutes. Powerful stuff.
Small world dept.
I was at that Red Army Chorus concert (next post) as well.
Stretch, that's a wild coincidence!
Post a Comment