Next week this blog turns 18 (!). That's a milestone that makes you think back on the journey.
This journey began in the lead up to the release by the US Supreme Court of the Heller v. District of Columbia opinion - in other words, this blog pre-dates Heller. Looking back on the last 18 years here, things are really different for the Second Amendment.
It's all well and good to have a Constitution that's written down in black and white, but that doesn't help much if the Legislatures ignore it and the Courts refuse to strike down infringing laws. That has changed, and while there are still pieces of broken Gun Control on the floor needing to be swept up, the change is profound. Let's take a quick recap on that and then talk about what it means.
Heller v. D.C. (2008) stated as the plain law of the land that Second Amendment rights apply to individuals, not just to State Militias. It kind of seems ridiculous to actually have to write this today, but that was the "accepted" legal understanding prior to Heller.
McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) held that Heller applied not just to the District of Columbia, but to all the States (via the 14th Amendment).
New York Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) was the hammer blow. It established that the meaning of the Second Amendment as it was understood at the time was what it really meant, and that gun control laws had to demonstrate that the laws are consistent with that. This flipped the switch - no longer would citizens have to demonstrate that they have a right, but the government has to demonstrate that they don't.
This is what has left all those broken pieces of Gun Control cluttering up the floor. Sure, they still need to be swept up, but look where things are now:
- Gun permitting is not dead, but it's coughing up blood. "Shall Issue" permitting is the law of the land - governments have to prove that you shouldn't be allowed to carry rather than you justify why do need to.
- Most States were "Shall Issue" in 1990. None are today. In fact, half the States don't require you to have any permit at all to carry a firearm.
- "Assault Weapons" Bans are the last refuge of the desperate. Liberal Legislatures that pass these today know for certain that they will be struck down. Increasingly, the Courts are imposing restraining orders preventing the laws from going into force while they are being litigates.
- The National Firearms Act of 1934 is a pale shadow of its former self. Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" (which was anything but) repealed the tax on suppressors. The Tax Code is really the main way for the Fed.Gov to impose the law here; no tax, no law.
So what does all this mean? The biggest advancement in Second Amendment rights has been the normalization of the idea of firearms. The biased media has a really hard time today in painting us as a fringe community.
Heck, SCOTUS just ruled that the Fed.Gov cannot prevent firearms purchases by people who smoke pot. The ruling was unanimous. Conservative Alito and liberal Kagan co-authored a concurring opinion. It's cats and dogs living together.
This has even been absorbed by the lower courts - the District and Circuit Courts of Appeals. It's great if SCOTUS makes a ruling, but if the lower courts don't enforce it then it doesn't carry much weight. We saw a fair amount of this during the years after Heller. Now we don't. Sure, there will always be the rogue District Judge who allows a plainly infringing gun control law, but these are getting struck down on appeal.
We're no longer the weirdos, the weirdos are on the other side. The Class War against gun owners is pretty much over.
That's one heck of a change in 18 years.


