HAYWOOD COUNTY, Tenn. — A Haywood County woman is accused of using a stun gun on a McDonald's manager and trying to drag him out of the restaurant's drive-thru window.
...
"She grabs me by my hair, pulls me out of the window," Jacob Jordan said. "That's when she has the taser, trying to go for my throat, punching me in my face, punching me in my eyes. Just beating me."
Cell phone video shows the assault Jordan experienced while working at the McDonald's in Brownsville.
Jordan, an overnight manager, said two customers were upset about how long it took to fill their order. Jordan said they wouldn't stop blowing their car horn.
...
He said Glidwell hit him with her credit card and used a stun gun, leaving a nasty looking mark on his neck.
"At first we thought it was just scratch marks from her fingers until you look at the video, and you can clearly see her trying to jam the taser into my throat," Jordan said.
He said the whole time, she was threatening to kill him.
"Saying that because I voted for Trump I deserved this," Jordan said. "I wasn't even old enough to vote when he ran."
It's time for the Democrats to admit that they lost the last election and get on with a peaceful transfer of power. They keep telling us that they're nicer than we are, but nice people don't hang out with violent thugs like this. If they aren't willing to condemn these attacks from the left, why should they expect the rest of us to condemn similar attacks from the right?
However this plays out, there will not be a double standard that privileges their side. One set of rules for everyone. I'd prefer those rules to be "no violence", but I keep waiting for the Democrats to condemn things like this, or the antifa attack and beating of a gay conservative reporter, or a Bernie Bro shooting up the GOP caucus baseball team. I'm kind of getting tired of waiting.
Tagged Democrats suck because, well, you know.
7 comments:
There is something coming. I don't know what it is, but it's definitely coming, is being pushed by Dems, progressives, and "liberals", and - as the saying goes - it "won't end well". Coastal elites are ignoring the anger of residents of "flyover country", not a smart move if you want things like food, fuel, and electricity... and especially when you aren't capable to take those things by force from a population that is probably very capable of keeping you off their lands.
It would be interesting to know what color they were.
Demographic details are both irrelevant and - other than the info that the manager is gay - unsurprising.
TW
"....I'd prefer those rules to be "no violence"...."
You will get your wish. Unfortunately, it will take some time to arrange and the process will be unpleasant for all, but more so to some.
"However this plays out, there will not be a double standard that privileges their side. One set of rules for everyone. I'd prefer those rules to be "no violence", but I keep waiting for the Democrats to condemn things like this, or the antifa attack and beating of a gay conservative reporter, or a Bernie Bro shooting up the GOP caucus baseball team. I'm kind of getting tired of waiting."
There are already two sets of rules - Democrats can do anything they want, and Republicans can do nothing. Because Progressives have only two rules - support the narrative, and grab power by any means available.
When someone in Portlandgrad decides they've finally had enough, we'll see that there are in fact two sets of rules. The full (ahem) majesty of the law will be brought to bear on the zek(s) at the epicenter; the urkas, being socially friendly elements, will get something at best cosmetic, to be undone once the cameras and klieg lights are off.
It is coming whether you want it or not. It takes only one side to start a civil war and the Left wills it. The outcome will involve mass causalities (Bosnia scaled up to US size) and and destruction of the prosperity that we have achieved.
I get frustrated talking to my friends on the Right about this. They seem to break down into two factions. The first denies the total malevolence of the Left and thinks that we can somehow muddle through and restore things as they were before (something). This ends in surrender and the destruction of the republic. The second seems to welcome a civil war because they believe that we will win and easily. So said every advocate for every war since the dawn of history. Well, it won't be easy and we might not win. And even if we do, it ends in the destruction of the republic because of the things we will have to do to win.
If the republic is to be preserved, it can only be done in the relatively healthy parts of the country. See the red/blue county map for a reasonable approximation of this. So it must be the national divorce. But both factions above hate this, because magic dirt or the Chinese or something.
Post a Comment