Thursday, June 9, 2016

More on self driving cars

It's full speed ahead:
[Networkworld reports: "Qualcomm today announced its Connected Car Reference Platform intended for the car industry to use to build prototypes of the next-generation connected car. Every category from economy to luxury car will be much smarter than the connected luxury car of today, creating a big opportunity for Qualcomm to supply semiconductors to automakers and suppliers. Qualcomm described the following features of the Connected Car Reference Platform in its release:

Scalability: Using a common framework that scales from a basic telematics control unit (TCU) up to a highly integrated wireless gateway, connecting multiple electronic control units (ECUs) within the car and supporting critical functions, such as over-the-air software upgrades and data collection and analytics. 
Future-proofing: Allowing the vehicleâ(TM)s connectivity hardware and software to be upgraded through its life cycle, providing automakers with a migration path from Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) to hybrid/cellular V2X and from 4G LTE to 5G. 
Wireless coexistence: Managing concurrent operation of multiple wireless technologies using the same spectrum frequencies, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and Bluetooth Low Energy. 
OEM and third-party applications support: Providing a secure framework for the development and execution of custom applications."]
"Secure".  You keep using that word ...

The comments at the link are gratifyingly horrified.  This one pretty much sums it up for me:
Problem is matey, I have bought so much high tech junk over the last few decades that has routinely fucked up, in fact software programmers claim it as the norm and seriously, what do you expect perfect software. Well, yeah, when going 100km an hour down a road I expect perfect software, you can't deliver, well then, no thanks. 
Yeah, pretty much.  That '67 GTO is looking better and better.  Hack that, bitches!

In other news of the connected auto world, it seems that major computer security vendors see automotive computing as a sucking chest wound of security fail - in other words, a market opportunity:
Just shy of a year after the infamous Jeep Cherokee hack by a pair of researchers, the automobile industry is quietly testing cybersecurity features from IoT startups and traditional security companies for its networked vehicles. 
Symantec today added what is now its fourth car security product -- an anomaly detection system for automotive vehicles that is based on its existing technology as well as its Internet of Things line, timed with the TU-Automotive connected car conference in Detroit this week. The security vendor also sells Symantec Embedded Security, which includes Critical System Protection, Code Signing, and Managed Public Key Infrastructure for the auto sector.
So the security of the automotive sector is so stinkin' bad that the computer security companies see it as a way to shore up their bottom lines.  I'm not sure whether I'm reassured that someone will at least try to mind the store, or horrified that ineffective Symantec bloatware will be riding shotgun ...

6 comments:

Comrade Misfit said...

I will drive my `05 non-networked Honda until the wheels fall off.

Old NFO said...

'66 GTO... :-) And hell no... they can KEEP those self drivers...

bluesun said...


This is definitely in your wheelhouse, Borepatch

Unknown said...

Seriously, the auto industry should do like the aircraft industry had to do: DO-178 series, currently DO-178C. “Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification,”
And the specialized tools to validate such software such as LDRA and VectorCAST.

It's not hard, it just takes dedication and willpower. Otherwise, imagine having a BSOD on your flight instrumentation panel on landing...

Roy said...

"It's not hard, it just takes dedication and willpower..." ...and Money.

And that right there is the rub. It adds to the cost, and that will adversely impact executive bonuses.

matism said...

Do note that, when they hacked the Jeep, they also said the Cadillac Escalade would have been almost as easy to do. Of course, Cadillac being Government Motors, they realized they would get the Gibson treatment if they dared do so.

Also please understand that the Cadillac Escalade is not a unique product. Smart money says it shares the same electronics and software as the GMC Yukon, the GMC Yukon XL, the GMC Sierra, the Chevrolet Tahoe, the Chevrolet Suburban, and the Chevrolet Silverado. Do you begin to understand just HOW MANY of the cars on America's highways today are susceptible???