Oh dear, now we have three peer reviewed papers (Lindzen and Choi, Spencer and Braswell, and now Richard P. Allan) based on observations that show a net negative feedback for clouds, and a strong one at that. What will Trenberth and Dessler do next? Maybe the editor of Meteorological Applications can be persuaded to commit professional suicide and resign?Me, I think that the next step is that Michael Mann and Phil Jones will send in the Spetsnaz, or something.
Take that, Denier Scum!
5 comments:
And how about that little Greenland ice error thing? Whoops! It's really still there. Sorry 'bout that.
Last week the alarmists published their article on the "shrinking polar ice cap we'reallgonnadiethepoorpolarbears" the day after a report that the ice cap is thickening & regaining its former size.
It's settled: they're losers.
http://www.namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=2219&highlight=robinson
More than 31,000 American scientists have signed the following petition which Dr. Art Robinson initiated. His Power Point Presentation below compares their findings against the opposition, and lists the names of the scientists who signed.
The video reminds me of brothers time in the Light Infantry (sister regiment of the Rangers)who wore green back in ye olden days when red got you killed.
His platoon was assigned would in the event of the Soviet invasion be assigned the unenviable task of taking out the lead tank with all the communications gear using a Land Rover and a mortar in a vain attempt to slow down the advance. They went for accuracy because he said they had maybe two shots to get it right before things would not go right for them.
They generally picked the loony's for the job. For obvious reasons.
Here's an interesting shot.
http://s2.postimage.org/1ylgra7cr/Nagoand_Mortor.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/3gqh4eb
Post a Comment