Saturday, January 21, 2012

George B. McClellan's Presidential Campaign

George McClellan was in charge of the Army of the Potomac from July 1861 until November 1862.  An able administrator, he turned the post-Bull Run Army of the Potomac from a rag tag mass of whipped militia into a professional fighting force.  It's probably not going too far to say that he laid the foundation upon which the ultimate Union victory lay.

But he was cautious to a fault.  While nicknamed "The Little Napoleon" (from his preferred poses for the new fangled photographers of the day), he refused to implement Napoleon's dictum for success on the battlefield: l'audace, l'audace. toujours l'audace!*

And so Robert E. Lee was able to play him like a fiddle.  Lee took over command of the Army of Northern Virginia in June of 1862 when its former commander Joseph Johnston was wounded.  Lee was not then held in high regard, his stock having fallen from its pre-war heights.  Lee soon put that to rest.  In a stunning series of tactical assaults called The Seven Days, Lee essentially lost eight battles in seven days, at which point McClellan loaded his entire army on naval transport and sailed back to Washington, defeated.

Lee wasn't attacking the Army of the Potomac, he was attacking McClellan.  No matter how good an administrator and organizer McClellan was, he couldn't fight effectively.

Actually, that's not true - he was very effective in fighting his own organization, and especially his commander in chief.  His insubordination was the least of it (he once kept Lincoln waiting 30 minutes when the President came to call, and then had Lincoln informed that he had gone to bed and couldn't see him).  He wouldn't fight.  There was always a reason why - he didn't have enough men, he didn't have enough supplies, the weather was bad.  Lincoln once summoned a council of war of McClellan's generals - pointedly without McClellan himself - saying that if McClellan wasn't using the army he'd like to borrow it for a while.

Finally, McClellan went too far, and Lincoln fired him.  Whether for revenge, or because of his weakness for flattery, he ran against Lincoln in the 1864 elections.  Grant and Sherman won that for Lincoln.  Unlike McClellan, they would fight.

Newt Gingrich just handed Mitt Romney his tail end, utterly demolishing the myth of Romney's inevitability.  Watching this unfold, and looking at Romney's impressive organizational skills, his rich war chest, and his support from the entire GOP establishment, I cannot stop thinking about George McClellan reviewing the Army of the Potomac.  Crisp new uniforms, polished brass, snappy salutes, and brave martial music from the marching bands made for a pretty - and a pretty impressive - sight.

(Image location)
It was a sight that contrasted with Ulysses S. Grant, whose appearance was slovenly, and whose personal faults almost lost him his command.  Everyone in the Union Army establishment wanted to get rid of him in 1862.  Everyone but Abraham Lincoln who said I can't spare him.  He fights.

Ulysses S. Gingrich just won a lopsided victory against all odds.  He did it because while he possesses many personal faults when compared to his opponent, he possesses one outstanding virtue.

He fights.

It's a long, long road to the Republican Convention, and anything can happen.  It's hard to say who will be the nominee.  But it's not at all hard to see the Obama Campaign attacking not the GOP, but their General should the timid and overly calculating Romney get the nod**.  If Newt is the standard bearer, then it will be a real rumble.

Shelby Foote, in his incomparable history The Civil War: A Narrative writes about the Union Army after they had been thrashed at the beginning of the Wilderness Campaign in 1864.  Dejected - they always knew that Bobby Lee drove them back after a single battle - they prepared to march back to Washington.  Instead, the order came down the line to turn south.  A cheer rose up, as men who had been whipped squared their shoulders and turned to chase their foe.  That's the kind of leader Grant was.

That's the kind that Newt is, too.


To the surprise of the V Corps men, the march was south, in rear of Hancock's portion of the line.  At first they thought that this was done to get them on the plank road, leading east towards Chancellorsville, but when they slogged past the intersection they knew that what they were headed for was not the Rapidan or the Rappahannock, but another battle somewhere south, beyond the unsuspecting rebel flank.  Formerly glum, the column now began to buzz with talk.  Packs were lighter; the step quickened, spirits rose with the growing realization that they were stealing another march on old man Lee.  Then came cheers, as a group on horseback - "Give way, give way to the right," one of the riders kept calling to the soldiers on the road - doubled the column at a fast walk, equipment jingling.  In the head was Grant, a vague, stoop-shouldered figure, undersized on Cincinnati, the largest of his mounts ...
McClellan looked ever so much more the General than did Grant.  Romney looks ever so much more Presidential than Gingrich.  But neither McClellan nor Romney would fight.  The troops know it.

* Boldness, boldness, always boldness.

** Apologies to all true Sons and Daughters of Dixie for casting Obama in the role of Robert E. Lee.

Your Saturday evening grin

Brought to you via PJ Media's Scot "Scrappleface" Ott.



UPDATE 21 January 2012 19:29: Thanks to Sean Sorrentino for pointing out that Scott Ott is Scrappleface, not IowaHawk.

Always trust content from Borepatch!

Sometime back I wrote about how I'd switched from Google to Bing as my default search engine:
I made the switch, in all of my browsers.  Bing is now the default search engine for me.  No, this isn't because of Google's long and sorry neglect of American patriotic holidays, although that's always been an annoyance.

It's because I don't trust the search results.
I list my reasons there, but it boils down that that most critical of words when you deal with customers: trust.

Reader Ron emails to point out that I'm not the only one:
I just switched the default search engine in my browser from Google to Bing. And if you care about working efficiently, or getting the right results when you search, then maybe you should too. Don't laugh!

Google changed the way search works this week. It deeply integrated Google+ into search results. It's ostensibly meant to deliver more personalized results. But it pulls those personalized results largely from Google services—Google+, Picasa, YouTube. Search for a restaurant, and instead of its Yelp page, the top result might be someone you know discussing it on Google Plus. Over at SearchEngineland,Danny Sullivan has compiled a series of damning examples of the ways Google's new interface promotes Plus over relevancy. Long story short: It's a huge step backwards.
This Gizmodo story - and the links it cites - make for fascinating reading.  Why would Google play games with people's trust?  I mean, if you get a critical mass of people like me, then the number of searches collapses, the ad revenue associated with those searches collapses, and Google's earnings per share collapse.  What could possibly cause them to act this recklessly with the company's future?

I think that it's the Law Of Large Numbers.
As an example, assume that company X has a market capitalization of $400 billion and company Y has a market capitalization of $5 billion. In order for company X to grow by 50%, it must increase its market capitalization by $200 billion, while company Y would only have to increase its market capitalization by $2.5 billion. The law of large numbers suggests that it is much more likely that company Y will be able to expand by 50% than company X. 
Google's Market Capitalization is $190 billion.  To grow by even 10%, they need that to turn into $209 billion.  At a current P/E of 20, that means that they need to increase their revenue by $19B/20, or an extra Billion dollars.  Where does that come from?

It's hard to see them growing their market share, which seems to have maxed out at around 66%.  The search advertising market seems to have settled into the typical high tech pattern of a dominant company (the "gorilla"), a primary smaller competitor (the "chimp"), and a bunch of small players (the "monkeys").  Bing is picking up share from monkeys like Yahoo, while Google seems stalled.  But even if their market share is stalled, is there an extra 10% there?  Good luck with that.

But it's even worse than that.  As more effective competitors emerge, you see what you would expect in a competitive market - the price Google can charge for its ads is dropping:
NEW YORK (AP) - Shares of Internet search engine Google Inc. fell in premarket trading Friday after it revealed that it got less money for each ad in the fourth quarter.

The stock was down $49.46, or 7.7 percent, at $590.11 per share in trading ahead of the market opening. The shares haven't been below $600 in regular trading since Dec. 1.

Investors had expected that the surge of online holiday shopping in the U.S. would let Google charge more for its ads. Instead, the average price fell by 8 percent from the same time in 2010.
So they need to grow their market share by more than 10% to get that extra Billion.  How?

By selling the trust they've developed with their customers, is what it seems.  I've used Google since they were a beta, way back in 1998.  I switched from Yahoo and Altavista to Google because I believed that the search results were more accurate.  I've now switched from Google to Bing for the same reason.  And so did the author of the Gizmodo story.

I'm not sure that I'm ready to short Google, but someone is going to make a ton of money doing that some day.  Because when Google has The Big Miss, their stock will drop by 50%.  The market rewards Tech companies with ridiculous P/E rations, but only when they perform.  When they miss, the market overcorrects.  Sorry, I don't make the rules here.

It's odd that a company like Google seems to blind to the realities of new media.

Thanks to Ron for triggering a post where I tread onto Silicon Graybeard territory.

It's still better than a vacation to Disney World with Obama


Well, it is.

Hawkshaw Hawkins - Lonesome 77203

(Image via Wikipedia)
Hawkshaw Hawkins lived a life that's hard to believe isn't out of a Hollywood script.  He got the money to buy his first guitar as a kid by trapping rabbits.  He enlisted in the Army in World War II, fighting in the Battle of the Bulge.  And he made the big time with this song three days before his death in the plane crash that killed Patsy Cline, leaving behind a pregnant wife with a small child.

The song spent 25 weeks on the Country charts.

It was a different world back then.  This is old fashioned honky tonk music, although it was close enough in sound to Patsy's "Countrypolitan" that he fit into the tour.  But looking back, it strikes the "New Nashville" as being as out dated as trapping rabbits.  Or leaving your singing career to enlist.

ProTip to "New Nashville": that's why we like it.



Lonesome 77203 (Songwriter: Justin Tubb)
Had our number changed today, although I hated to
But each time the phone would ring,
They'd want to speak to you
And it hurts to tell them, you're not here with me
Maybe now, ole telephone will let me be.

It's not in the book now, so you'd better write it down
Just in case your love for me should ever come around
You might want to call and break the news to me
Just call Lonesome 7-7203

I keep the telephone beside me all the time
Hopeing you might want to call and say you've changed your mind
If you do, then darling you know where I'll be
I'm at Lonesome 7-7203

You're the only one I've given our new number to
So now if the telephone should ring I'll know it's you
If you ever long for love that used to be
Just call Lonesome 7-7203

Just call Lonesome 7-7203
Just like Hawkshaw Hawkins, they don't make 'em like that anymore.  Too bad.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Etta James, Rest In Peace

One of the great artists of our day has passed on.  Over a career spanning half a century, she became unquestionably the greatest female blues singer - and possibly the greatest blues singer, period.  With six Grammys and a fistful of other awards, it's impossible to pick a favorite, and so I'll leave you with this gem from her last album, released only two months ago.



... show some appreciation for me, Baby.

We'll miss you, Etta.  And envy the Lord's choir, which has now kicked things up a notch.

Etta James, 1938 - 2012.  Rest in peace.

The Progressive State owns you

They want your soul, but they'll settle for your body:

Earlier this month, a Norfolk [Massachusetts] probate judge declared a pregnant woman with schizophrenia incompetent and ordered her to undergo an abortion, stating she could be “coaxed, bribed, or even enticed’’ into the hospital for the procedure.

Unbidden, the judge further directed that the 32-year-old woman be sterilized “to avoid this painful situation from recurring in the future.’’
Via Stephany, we find the most appalling abuse of the Mentally Ill by the State that I've ever heard of, at least since the bad old Progressive days of Eugenics.  Back then, they had no hesitation to sterilize the "feeble minded" for the greater good of the American Race.

Ah, but if we only get "really Smart regulation" written by "really Smart people", all will be for the best, as together, shoulder-to-shoulder, we build the New Soviet Progressive State!

Fortunately, this madness was stopped, but it took an Appeals Court to do so.  Think about that.  A Court of Law in the Commonwealth actually ruled that a woman be sterilized and her baby killed, against her will.  I mean, we don't want any breeders like that Sarah Palin woman, do we?

Or old people:

Under Obamacare, an “ethics panel” will convene to determine whether your life is worth saving or not. But you will not be a “you”; you will be a thoroughly de-humanized “unit.” And the reason you will be a “unit” is because if this enlightened sort of “ethics panel” discussed you as a male or a female, they might be tempted to think of you as a human being — someone’s mother or sister or wife — a person who is beloved, and whose life is valued, even if the brain and body aren’t functioning at optimal levels.

So if you are a 70 year-old Nancy Pelosi
, or Paul Krugman — with a potent private health insurance plan such as the one enjoyed by Members of Congress and other bureaucrats — you will get every appropriate surgery and treatment applicable.

But if you are a 70 year-old former bookkeeper or waitress on Medicare, well — you have swung your last golfclub or danced your last waltz, because the “ethics panel” that assesses your unithood will have no problem inventing a equation that goes something like, “Potential-Tax-revenues-minus-potential-cost-divided-by-social-and-political-value-equals…a negligible unit.
And (via The Anchoress) in case you think that I'm exaggerating that this is precisely what Realy Smart People™ think is Really Smart Policy™, here ya go:



The only two truly unavoidable things in this veil of tears are death and taxes, and Paul Krugman rolls them both together into one neat package for you.

And so, gaze upon your State, ye Progressives.  No, these aren't mistakes - or if they were, the "mistake" was that the mask slipped, we got a glimpse at the man behind the curtain.

But you will obey - the State will decide decide your health care choices, from cradle to grave.  It's all done by such cleverly Smart people, don't you know?  And if the time between cradle and graze collapses to zero, well, just think of all the money that the future Fed.Gov has to distribute to favored political interests!  A single death is a tragedy, but a million deaths help balance the budget!  And nobody would ever take this too far:

Nazi pro-Eugenics poster via Wikipedia


Onward to the New Progressive State, Citizen!  And right now, if you know what's good for you.


Postscript for those who think that I am being too harsh to the Progressives: This isn't a one-off, a "black swan" (from the same Boston Globe article):

Daniel Pollack, a professor at Yeshiva University who has studied the issue of consent in such cases, said it is not clear how often such orders are issued.

“My guess is it happens a lot more than we know,’’ he said.
The Judge who made the original (now overturned) decision is named Christina Harms.  If I still lived in Massachusetts, the following (First Amendment protected) opinion would risk me losing my guns*:  Judge Christina Harms should not be impeached for this grotesque and illegal abuse of her authority.  Rather, Judge Christina Harms should be horsewhipped through the streets of Norfolk, Massachusetts.

* The Commonwealth of Massachusetts can kill kiss my ass. [Thanks to commenter Rick C for pointing out a rather unfortunate typo.]

What? The public hates the SOPA/PIPA "shut down the Internet" bill?

Inconceivable!

Another reason for Congress, K-Street, and the Media to hate them:

A new poll taken of the political class elites reveals that the public's approval rating has fallen to a new low with only 3% of the cream of society expressing satisfaction with the public's performance. This is down from 97% in January 2009, when the transformative President Obama took office.
Everything in the "News" media is "shut up, he suggested."  Whatevs.  I got The People's Cube for all my Party Organ™ opinion.

Riddle me this, Mr. ABC News "Sanctity of Marriage" Man

Weer'd brings up a great point about the Mrs. ex-Newt thing:
First, Newt’s ex is an idiot. He was plugging her while he was married to wife #1, and suddenly she’s surprised when he treats his marriage to her with the same respect and reverence as he did wife #1? This is the same stupidity of Maria Shcriver being “unaware” that Arnie was impregnating the help. The dude was a wild cocksmith when he was courting her, and she thought she could tame that beast?
And that got me thinking.  Where's a whole school of Country music for "done me wrong" songs.  Case in point:



The lyrics cut to the heart of the matter:
If I had your name
I'd be changin' it right now
Why is her legal name still "Gingrich"?  If what she says about him is true, she must have been mad as an ol' wet hen at him.  Srlsy.  So why didn't she change her name and be done with him.

I'm sympathetic to the "wronged woman" idea*, but come on.  This is 15 minutes of fame, nothing more.  Good thing that she isn't the wronged Mrs. ex-Obama, though, because then this would clearly not be newsworthy.

Prediction: nobody cares.  Just as the public began suffering scandal fatigue during the Clinton years, the last few months of media hyperventilating over the scandal du jour is creating antibodies in the Body Public.  If they really want to get people's attention, they probably should bring a real scandal.

* I like me some Country Music, if nothing else.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

CNN just won the South Carolina primary for Newt Gingrich



Man, like when did those dudes decide to start helping out a conservative?  /mockery

Smartest kids in their class, right there.  /mockery

Newt's not running against Romney.  He's not running against Obama.  He's running against the Media.  Look at how many standing ovations he gets.

CNN - the most trusted name in television.  /mockery

Bill Millin, rest in peace

I don't do a good job answering comments, not like I'd like.  Case in point: reader knottedprop left a comment a month ago telling of how Bill Millin had passed on.  Don't give me that "Bill Millin who?" bit - you know about what he did on that Day of Days.



In one hundred years your children and grandchildren will look back and say "They must have been Giants in those days."

Sure were.  Rest in peace.

Thanks to knottedprop for passing along something that I'd missed.

The three faces of the Republican Party

The Antiplanner has a very interesting post up, about the fractured coalition that is the GOP:

The Iowa caucuses highlighted a little-known fact about the Republican Party: it is really a coalition of three different groups. First and best-known are the “conservatives,” represented by Rick Santorum and the 25 percent of Iowa caucuses who voted for him. Conservatives tend to be fiscally conservative, but are more reliably socially conservative, meaning they tend to oppose such things as gay rights, abortion, and recreational drugs.

The second group is the libertarians, represented by Ron Paul and the 21 percent of the caucuses who voted for him (although Gary Johnson, who was ignored by the media and the party, is closer to being a true libertarian). Perhaps even more than conservatives, the libertarians are hard-core fiscal conservatives. But they are social liberals, favoring gay rights, legalization of recreational drugs, and (for the most part) legalized abortions.

...

Advocates of the latter view call themselves neoconservatives and form the third group that makes up the Republican Party. This is a strange name because historically it was liberals, starting with Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, who advocated U.S. military action that was not strictly for self defense, while it was conservatives such as Henry Cabot Lodge and Robert Taft who opposed such actions.
His conclusions about the Tea Party, and whether a Romney victory would be a defeat for him are spot on but you'll have to RTWT.  Smart stuff.

The utter security disaster that was the SOPA DNS restriction

The most interesting part of the whole SOPA/PIPA debate is the original restrictions that the statutes placed on DNS, the Internet Domain Name System.  The first objections were raised by the White House, and the DNS clause was quickly dropped.  None of the media outlets are looking into this at more than a cursory level.  They should.

This provision was so bad that the behind the scenes Fed.Gov security establishment (almost certainly the NSA) pushed the President to block the provision [note: this is speculation, but informed speculation].  The reason is that the clause would have good news and bad news.

The good news: computer viruses would almost cease to exist.  The bad news: they'd cease to exist because they wouldn't be needed by the Bad Guys.

I'd like to explain why, but you'll want to read an early post of mine, How to hack a classified network.  This post builds on that one.  The gist was that end users want interesting or funny content, and will figure out how to get it even if the network architecture intentionally tries to stop them.

And so to the DNS block.  DNS is the communication exchange that translates names (google.com) into IP addresses (numeric identifiers that the Internet uses to deliver your messages).  The original bill would allow the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) to basically block the DNS entry for infringing sites, making it hard to get to them.  Not impossible, mind, because if you know that Google.com's IP address is 10.1.2.3, you can just type "http://10.1.2.3" into your browser's address bar and you'll get there fine.

But the reasoning was that it's too hard to keep track of the IP addresses, which is probably right.  And so, more and more sites would begin to disappear from the 'Net, and more and more interesting and funny content with them.

And so to my old post, and to frustrated users:
The problem is that what you want (security) and what your users want (information on Al Gore's Intarwebz) inherently is in conflict. You can't win unless they lose, and vice versa.
And now to the threat scenario that (presumably) brought the NSA calling at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.  Suppose that someone set up an uber DNS server in Moscow, a server that didn't block any addresses at all.  Remember those frustrated Internet users?  All they'd have to do is change their computer's configuration so that their computer used that Moscow DNS server, rather than the one their ISP gave them.  Sure, you'd have to manually configure Windows to do this, but you'd only have to do it once.  Soon, people would be writing scripts that you could click on that would do it for you.

In a matter of months, a large part of the United States would be relying on the Moscow DNS server.  Presumably, this would include a lot of computers in the US Federal Government itself.

So what, you say.  Well, remember - DNS tells you the address of where you want to go.  What if it sends you somewhere else?  They'd have to be clever doing this - you'd have to transparently end up at your intended destination, but DNS could cause all your traffic to go through servers in Russia which would silently read everything that you type.



Security gurus call this a "Man in the Middle" attack, and it's hard to see how the Russians (or Red Chinese, or a whole bunch of other folks) couldn't entirely pwn everyone's traffic.

The Russians wouldn't need computer viruses to plant on your computer to get your data.  You'd be sending them all your data all by yourself.

Just how much of this traffic is encrypted strongly enough that it couldn't be read?  Quite frankly, nobody knows.  What everyone does know is that number is way less than 100%.

Remember that a lot of this traffic would be coming from senate.gov, treasury.gov, state.gov and whitehouse.gov.

Oh, and for the traffic that does have decent encryption?  Well, roll out the computer viruses.  They know that you're going to your bank (they have the DNS request, duh), and so why not pass down a "Click here to access your bank" fishing link.  You only get that pop-up when you actually go to your bank - probably 95% of everyone will click to install.  Next -> Next -> Next Oh for God's sake just install already!

Game over, man.  Smart bit of legislation, right there.



And so the White House made them take it out.  This is all speculation, of course, but I'd bet cash money that this was how it played out.

The punchline?  SOPA and PIPA probably can't actually work without blocking DNS.  And so they have to rely on overly broad (and likely unconstitutional) measures like if there's a single link, the entire site goes down.  But I'm not a lawyer, and so won't speculate on the intimate constitutionality of this piece of craptacular legislation.

But this is the part of they story that you hadn't heard.  Some things seem like a good idea, but aren't.



Looks like the MPAA didn't climb a mountain, they climbed a mountain lion.

The Second Amendment: the Political is Personal

The 1960s saw the battle cry The Personal is Political, as a rallying cry for social agitation.  Personal preference gave rise to political movements, some for the better and some for the worse.  Well, that street runs both ways - political actions can - and should - lead to personal acts in response.

A year ago today, I began a post describing the political actions of the Town of Arlington, MA:
I've linked several times to posts over at the blog Dispatches from TJICistan.  TJIC is an outspoken (some might say extremely so) advocate of smaller government.  He's also a firearms owner in the People's Republic of Massachusetts.  While he owns guns, it appears that he's no longer allowed to possess any
Massachusetts' gun control laws are in my opinion unconstitutional, since they give each town's Police Chief complete discretion to decide who can possess firearms, who can't, and why not.  Arlington revoked TJIC's enumerated right to keep arms, without so much as charging him with any crime.  Indeed, they could not, because the words that they objected to are clearly constitutionally protected.

It was a political act, intended to make an example of him.  Well, the Political is Personal:
Brad_In_MA emails to point out that Thursday is the anniversary of the epic screwing of TJIC by the People's Soviet of Massachusetts*.  He has a call to action that is filled with win:

I propose a Jan 19 BUYcott of anything 2a related, in support of JTIC.  Mind putting up such a post?  I plan on getting a few targets and a brick of some .22lr range ammo for my ruger 22/45, aka Miss Cherry.  The idea is to BUY something.  Anything.  Price does not matter.  Quantity does not matter.  In short, a simple request for a simple action to support a Brother in Need.
I would go one step further, and suggest a buycott (the opposite of a boycott, 'natch, where you purposely buy from someone as opposed to refusing to buy from them).  As it turns out, TJIC is an entrepreneur, and has a company that makes this easy for everyone:  Smartflix.

Think Netflix, only for learning DVDs.  Want to learn CNC millingIntroduction to gunsmithingCombat Pistol UniversityM1 Garand Armorer course?

This is an opportunity for everyone to learn some skills that will likely appall the Usual Suspects™ in Massachusetts while helping to offset TJIC's legal costs (which will also appall the Usual Suspects™ in Massachusetts).

And so the call goes out.  Pass it on.  And look at SmartFlix, and point it out to your friends.  There's good stuff there.  Let's all stress his servers on January 19.
Let's put our own money where it will do some good defend the Second Amendment.  TJIC is fighting our battle.

Make it Personal.

Postscript: reader Stretch emails to tell us that he's taken direct Second Amendment action:


He describes this sweet heater's virtues, which are legion:

Browning Hi-Power/P-35
Belgium made.
A finish unknown to me. Possibly ceramic.
3-dot sights.
13 rounds of 9mm goodness to say "Up yours." to officious ... um ... officials everywhere.
The Arlington Police Department - arming citizens all over the country!

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Newt Gingrich, the GOP, and the Battle of World Views

I keep saying that this election is about a conflict of world views.  Obama came into office determined to fundamentally change the country, reshaping it to match a strongly leftist philosophy.  This is why it is such a danger to succumb to the "any Republican" (translation: Mitt Romney) trope that the establishment is trying to hammer down our throat.

Offered as Exhibit A in the case of the Republic vs. Big Government Republicans: George W. Bush.  He ran as a "compassionate conservative", which means "I'll spend your money for you almost as fast as Al Gore would."

What's needed is to crush the leftist ideology.  Not to show merely that it is wrong, but that it is illegitimate.  Ron Paul gets that:


The problem with Paul is not that he's loopy on foreign policy, but that he's too much of the kindly old uncle, rambling his way to something that makes sense instead of hitting you between the eyes.  He's a walking tl;dr, and his delivery is so laid back that half of the electorate will stop listening before he gets to his point.

Newt knows how to bring the ideas, hard, to where they make you stop and think.  Here he shreds Juan Williams.  His answer starts with a simple, blanket denial that he agrees with anything that Williams said.  Then he takes 90 seconds to flay any legitimacy that anyone thought Williams' question might have had from the bone, and then chews the bone to small pieces.  Williams is left utterly defeated, and the crowd is left on its feet in a standing ovation.

I realize that in Politically Correct circles it's not allowed to raise uncomfortable facts.  That's  not Reaganesque, it channels the best of Margaret Thatcher, breaking the British Labour party.



Crush your enemy's ideology.  The crowd booed Williams.  Booed.  And this isn't just a one-off, either:



We actually think that work is good.  But remember, the enemy ideology lives not just in the Democratic Party.  George W. Bush's "Compassionate Conservativism" also falls under is icy glare.



Crush the enemy's ideology.  See it driven from the airwaves.  Listen to the lamentation of his professors.  Newt does it, over and over.

Ron Paul does, too.  But Paul is incoherent on foreign policy.  That might not have made a difference in 2000, but it does in 2012.  Newt brings the ideological hammer down:



Andrew Jackson had a good idea about what to do with America's enemies: kill them.

There are many things that I do not like about Newt, but one advantage that he has over the entire GOP crowd is that he knows how to deflate the Democrat's ideology, to show not that it is mistaken, but that it is immoral.  Four years of that hammer will leave the political discussion in this country profoundly different.  The Republic needs that, and someone who will not flinch from repeatedly telling the opposition that they hate the poor:



It's the same conflict of visions.  Today's UK is profoundly different than it was in 1979, because the Iron Lady refused to back down in the face of a left - unions, the media, the universities - that held her in withering contempt.  By returning that contempt with equal fervor and backing it up with unarguable facts, she wrenched the Realm off of the track to ruin, to the point that "Red" Ken Livingston is a curiosity, and not the head of the Labour Party.

Newt is probably the only one here who can do the same.
Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
- Winston Churchill

UPDATE 19 January 2012 08:52: Thanks to Bob Owens for pointing out it was Juan Williams, not Juan Cole.

And a great darkness descended upon the land

Then Hashem said to Moshe: Hold out your arm towards the sky that there may be darkness upon the land of Egypt, a darkness that can be touched. Moshe held out his arm toward the sky and thick darkness descended upon all the land of Egypt for three days.
Pharaoh (Austin's own [Republican] Congressman Lamar Smith) has hardened his heart, and intends to bind us to the RIAA with the mighty chains of the SOPA and PIPA legislation.  And so a great darkness descends upon the land.

Peter rounds up the SOPA legislation Internet General Strike.  I agree with him - this is important.  The Internet has become mission critical, and has revolutionized politics throughout the world.  Turning the keys of the greatest communications medium ever devised by the mind of man over to Dinosaurs stuck in a dieing business model (that would be both the RIAA and the Dinosaur Political Parties) is madness.

It is, indeed, ceding the Promised Land to Pharaoh.

And so today I join the Internet General Strike.  This is a taste of what the Internet will be, should SOPA and PIPA become law of the land.  The Internet Ice Cream Machine is clenching its fist in Solidarity with Peter, Wikipedia, and all believers in truth and freedom.

I would gently remind my readers, though, that they should gaze upon Rep. Lamar Smith.  See, with eyes of seeing.  The GOP is not your friend.  Yea, they bring down darkness across the land.


I will be back tomorrow, after our Industrial Action.  I urge my fellow bloggers to join me in going dark today.  Join us, and shoulder to shoulder we will face down the Moloch State.  Show Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) that we will not go gently into that good night of central control.  We don't think it is for our good, or society's.
For it will be very difficult to persuade men of sense that he who with dry eyes and satisfaction of mind can deliver his brother to the executioner to be burnt alive, does sincerely and heartily concern himself to save that brother from the flames of hell in the world to come.
- John Locke, A Letter Concerning Toleration
The Dinosaurs smell a change on the breeze.  They roar their defiance, but we don't care.

UPDATE:  You need to watch this.


PROTECT IP / SOPA Breaks The Internet from Fight for the Future on Vimeo.

There is a form here that you can enter your address and email, and it will email your Senators.  If you do this, you should change the wording in the body.

Robb also has good advice.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Support a four-footed veteran

Adopt a vet:



This program makes me wag my tail:
1/31/2008 - LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS -- Most people go to the local pet store or animal shelter to find their new pet dog. But on Jan. 29, John and Jackie Yarborough from Phoenix flew to Lackland to adopt a 3-year-old German shepherd named Jenny. She was up for adoption after failing to meet the requirements necessary to become a military working dog.

...
First Lt. John Farmer, 341st Training Squadron Logistics Flight commander, supplied the Yarboroughs with Jenny's diet plan and proper transportation materials.

"Part of my job is to make sure the dogs that don't work out for our program find a good home," said Lieutenant Farmer. "We rely on people like John and Jackie to give these dogs that home. Just because these dogs don't work out for us, doesn't mean they won't make a great pet for someone else."
Sadly, the dogs become classified as "excess equipment" at the end of their careers.  Well, readers here will know of my love affair with old Mil-Surp.  This just gives it some added depth.

The FAQ for the program is here.

Your daily WTF



That's the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk taking green water over the flight deck.  80,000 tons displacement getting bobbed like a cork.  The flight deck is around 100 feet over the water line.  Hope that the Infirmary is stocked with plenty of Dramamine.

Via Blogbrother PISSED in an email.

The Presidential ticket from hell

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Adversity doesn't build character

It reveals character:
She said: ‘I want everyone to know how badly some people [aboard the sinking cruise liner Costa Concordia] behaved. It was a nightmare. I lost my daughter and my grandchildren in the chaos.

I was standing by the lifeboats and men, big men, were banging into me and knocking the girls. It was awful. There was a total lack of organisation. There was no one telling people where to go.

And when we finally got into a lifeboat, people, grown men, were trying to jump into the boat. I thought, if they land in here we are going to capsize.
Compare and contrast:

Update: Reports now say the number of passengers [on U.S. Air Flight 1549, which ditched in the Hudson River in January 2009] are between 140 and 160. A witness says the plane is floating downstream.

So far, it's believed all occupants are out of the plane. A secondary search is being conducted; fire department rescue teams from NJ and other NY are aiding.

A passenger said 1010WINS that the pilot told passengers should brace themselves—the passenger credited the pilot for steering them into the water and he said that they had children and women leave the plane first. The plane has floated down toward 23rd Street. [emphasis mine - Borepatch]
This is the point where I have to tell every Progressive who ever told us that "we need to be more like Europe" to shut up and sit down in the back of the room.  Grown ups are talking.

And I mean that.  For two generations, Europeans have been coddled by their governments - asked to do ever less (other than support their Ruling Elite) while the Governments do ever more.  We saw the result of that, in the icy waters of the Mediterranean, as society went feral and it was sauve qui peut.

Here on this side of the Pond, we saw the same scenario play out - a disaster threatening sudden, unexpected death in the icy Hudson river.  Here, it was women and children first*.

There cannot be a more basic condemnation of the Progressive State than the pairing of these two incidents.  It is basic that society exists above all to protect women and children - else, what future for society?  The way that the State has expunged this instinct from its society is all you need to know of the utter failure of the Progressive dream.

Too bad it took Europe down with it.  Used to be a nice place.

* Offer void in Massachusetts, where the dumb as a rock Attorney General Martha Coakley does not encourage self help.

Monday, January 16, 2012

Illegal receiver down field

You might recall that I tried to hook up my DVD player to my videoconferencing system so I could watch Netflix.  It worked great playing the DVD on my laptop and piping it to the Video monitor.  Going from the DVD player to the video unit resulted in nothing but a blank screen.  The reason is copy protection.

You see, the DVD player uses an HDMI output, which uses HDCP copy protection.  The video unit uses DVI.  No copy protection.

(Image source)
The DVD player didn't get a copy protection handshake, so the screen was blank.  Dark.  No output.

Copy protection was implemented so that content providers and hardware manufactures could offer me a far better video experience than I could get over analog composite cable.  So far, I'm digging this user experience.

So I guess I'll run over to Good Will, which has a bunch of old tube TVs for $20.

The whole experience, quite frankly, has put me right off all the "content" that I can't see.  Maybe I won't bother replacing the TV.  Screw 'em.

Mitt Romney's most dangerous opponent this year ...

... is Mitt Romney.



You know, I could really get behind one of those guys.  The problem is that the other is a bigger liar than Bill Clinton.  And I hadn't know that was even possible.

You're only allowed a certain number of flips before people doubt your character.

Via #1 Son, who is really paying attention to this election.

Postscript: I'd like to just ask you to pass this message along to a friend.

Anything for you, Mitt.  Whichever of you asked.

Compare and contrast: Mitt Romney and Ron Paul on Medical Marijuana

Both talk to the exact same dieing patient.  The exchanges could not have been more different.



I've said before a number of times that I thought that Mitt was a moral man, even though we disagreed on many things.  I no longer can say that.  To turn back on a sick man because you think that it's in your political interest to do so is grotesque.  It reminds me of Bill Clinton in 1992.  He allowed a mentally ill man to be executed because he thought it would win him votes from the "tough on crime" crowd.  Christopher Hitchens never let that subject drop:
After falling behind in the New Hampshire primary in 1992, and after being caught lying about the affair with Gennifer Flowers to which he later confessed under oath, Clinton left the campaign trail and flew home to Arkansas to give the maximum publicity to his decision to sign a death warrant for Ricky Ray Rector. Rector was a black inmate on death row who had shot himself in the head after committing a double murder and, instead of dying as a result, had achieved the same effect as a lobotomy would have done. He never understood the charge against him or the sentence. After being served his last meal, he left the pecan pie on the side of the tray, as he told the guards who came to take him to the execution chamber, "for later."
This is worse, actually.  The man in this video is no criminal.  He never shot a cop.  He just wants his suffering to be relieved.  He's not even asking the Fed.Gov to pay for that, just to not jail the doctors who would help him assuage his pain.

And Mitt turns his back and walks away.

Mitt Romney is a miserable, politically calculating, lying bastard.  I don't know about you, but for me, I will never vote for that scumbag.

Via #1 Son, who is (surprisingly to me) paying attention to the election this time around.

Aux armes, citoyens!

Brad_In_MA emails to point out that Thursday is the anniversary of the epic screwing of TJIC by the People's Soviet of Massachusetts.  He has a call to action that is filled with win:
I propose a Jan 19 BUYcott of anything 2a related, in support of JTIC.  Mind putting up such a post?  I plan on getting a few targets and a brick of some .22lr range ammo for my ruger 22/45, aka Miss Cherry.  The idea is to BUY something.  Anything.  Price does not matter.  Quantity does not matter.  In short, a simple request for a simple action to support a Brother in Need.
I would go one step further, and suggest a buycott (the opposite of a boycott, 'natch, where you purposely buy from someone as opposed to refusing to buy from them).  As it turns out, TJIC is an entrepreneur, and has a company that makes this easy for everyone:  Smartflix.

Think Netflix, only for learning DVDs.  Want to learn CNC millingIntroduction to gunsmithingCombat Pistol UniversityM1 Garand Armorer course?

This is an opportunity for everyone to learn some skills that will likely appall the Usual Suspects™ in Massachusetts while helping to offset TJIC's legal costs (which will also appall the Usual Suspects™ in Massachusetts).

And so the call goes out.  Pass it on.  And look at SmartFlix, and point it out to your friends.  There's good stuff there.  Let's all stress his servers on January 19.  Aux armes, citoyens!

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Fourth down and short

Quite some time ago, the TV here at FOB died the death.  That was annoying, because it was only 11 or 12 years old.  Now I don't watch much TV anyway, so the problem wasn't there.  Rather, it was losing the Netflix-over-Internet and ability to watch DVDs.

Yeah, I could watch the DVDs on the laptop, but even with the 17" laptop screen it just never was worth the bother.

And then today, I had this thought: what if you plug the laptop into the videoconferencing system I have here?  Turns out it works greatSo self, I said to myself.  What if you could plug the DVD player directly into the videoconferencing unit?

Well, the video unit is DVI, and the DVD player is HDMI.  No problem - Frye's Electronics had just the thing.  And so everything actually connects, I just don't get signal.  Phooey.

My plan is to call a timeout and bring in the special team (ask the engineers at work tomorrow).  I must say, it'd be nice to have Netflix and DVDs back, and instead of buying a $400 TV, I only paid $16 for the DVI-HDMI adapter.  We shall see.

Oh well - scored a John Lee Hooker CD at Half Priced Books.  $5.  Wh00t!

Harry Potter and the Ring Of Power

This Trailer has been rated PG for violence.  Viewer discretion is recommended.

Opus 5000

This is my 5,000th post.  As you well know, it's hard to get me to shut up.

For a while, I was tracking things like how many words I wrote a month.  The average was about 25,000, in around 120 posts each month.  If that still holds (and it sort of feels like it's in the ballpark), then I've probably written a little over a million words here.


Well, it seemed like a cunning plan at the time.

Paul Dukas - The Sorcerer's Apprentice

Go on your way,
do not tarry,
water carry,
let it flow abundantly,
and prepare a bath for me!
- Goethe, The Sorcerer's Apprentice
Fame can be annoying.  Paul Dukas was a late 19th/early 20th Century French composer, life long friend with Claude Debussy, and a complete perfectionist.  Rarely satisfied with his compositions, he destroyed many - perhaps the majority - and hid others.  One of his compositions was only found in recent years; its first performance was in 1995.

And so imagine the horror he felt at the fame that this piece rapidly achieved.  Inspired by Goethe's 1797 poem, it became a Parisian favorite.  And this was years before Disney's Fantasia made it even more popular.  It made Dukas somewhat cross, actually.

He was really no more than a journeyman composer and teacher, famous enough that he was buried in Paris' Père Lachaise cemetery with all the other artistic movers and shakers.  But not more famous than that.  Today, he's all but forgotten except for this song.

You can't always do what you want

Even when you really want to.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Dial 911 and die

I'm currently at FOB Borepatch in Austin, Texas.  Local law and tradition is that is some jerk assaults the perimeter here, and actually breaks in, inside the wire, I can shoot him graveyard dead.  I don't have to wonder, or ask myself if he's suffering from a life of deprivation - depraved because he's deprived.  The Castle Doctrine - recognizing that my home is my castle as recognized by ancient Common Law - allows me to assume that a housebreaker is up to no good and very likely has murderous intent.

Maybe they can get the drop on me, or my family.  But if they don't, we'll try our best to make sure that they don't go home that night fully staffed.  Of course, all Right Thinking People™ are appalled by this.  "We don't recommend self-help" says Massachusetts' dumb as a rock Attorney General Martha Coakley.  Call 911.  Lie back and think of (New) England.

Well, here in the free part of the United States of America, nobody believes that.  But even in Canada, the population is straying from Approved Opinions™:



That's not Texas.  That's Canada.

The Gun Control crowd is in a deep pit of fail.  The government is incompetent, courts repeatedly say that the government has no need to protect the likes of you, the gun control laws (surprise!) don't prevent prohibited persons like felons from getting guns.

And still they keep bleating for more gun control.  Not effective gun control.  Not making existing laws actually do what we were told they would.  Not requiring the Police to actually protect us within a certain time frame.

No, no, no.  They wake up in  the morning knowing the answer - more gun control.  They just don't know which question they'll be asked that day.

But even in Canada that message doesn't fly.  What an oddly incompetent group - Baldr Odinson, Joan Peterson, and the rest - that keep playing a broken musical instrument, thinking it sounds beautiful.  Even the Canadians don't listen any more.

Let's all call her Ma'am

Even if we have to work really hard to call her ma'am.



Via Theo.

This is so awesome that it draws blood


I think that this must be the "Tea Partiers are Terrorists" President of the Civility Project trying to make amends.  It's very, very well done and if I'm right, very gracious by Ms. Harrop.

Popehat to Advice Goddess to me to you.  Nuthin' nut 'Net.

UPDATE 14 January 2011 11:57: Bah, embed FAIL. You'll have to click through to Advice Goddess to watch.  Helpful Ptotip to the idiots doing the Daily Show's web marketing: if you want to allow people to embed this - you know, to get web presence - then it helps to give people embed code that actually, you know, works.  Love, Borepatch.

Vernon Dalhart - The Wreck of the Old 97

(Image source)
What does a New York City opera singer have to do with country music?  Don't judge a book by its cover.

You see, Vernon Dalhart was originally from Texas.  That wasn't even his real name - when he first performed in a production of Puccini, he made up a pseudonym to be listed in the program.  Vernon and Dalhart were the Texas towns where he rode on cattle drives in the 1890s.  He may have been singing in H.M.S. Pinafore, but he came by his cowboy chops honestly.

By the nineteen teens, phonographs were beginning to take off, and he auditioned in front of no less a figure as Thomas Edison.  By 1920, he was recording records - 12 inch 78-rpm disks with a single song on each side).  He recorded everything, from opera to Irish songs to Negro spirituals.  But everything changed in 1924.

The wreck of the Old 97 was a popular song about the 1903 wreck of a fast mail train.  It was country, not the other styles he sang, but since Dalhart recorded everything, he did this one too. 

This record sold seven million copies.  It was the best selling record until the 1950s, other than Christmas songs. 

But the music business was a tough one even then, and Dalhart's singing career was over by 1940.  He worked odd jobs including security guard during the War, dieing of a heart attack in 1948. 



The Wreck of The Old 97 (songwriters: G.B. Grayson, Henry Whitter)
Well they gave him his orders at Monroe Virginia

sayin' Steve you're way behind time
This is not 38 this is old 97
you must put her into Spencer on time

Then he turned around and said to his black greasy fireman
shovel on a little more coal
And when we cross that White Oak Mountain
watch old 97 roll

But it's a mighty rough road from Lynchburg to Danville
With a line on a three mile grade
It was on that grade that he lost his air brakes
see what a jump he made

He was goin' down the grade makin' 90 miles an hour
his whistle broke into a scream
He was found in the wreck with his hand on the throttle
A scalded to death by the steam

Then the telegram come to Washington station
and this is how it read
Oh that brave engineer that run old 97
he's a layin' in old Danville dead

So now all you ladies you better take a warnin'
from this time on and learn
Never speak harsh words to your true lovin' husband
He may leave you and never return
Vernon Dalhart was inducted into the Country Music Hall of Fame in 1981.

Friday, January 13, 2012

Blues Harp

Just because.

I missed one

The Independence Day Quiz.  I didn't know which of the Presidents they showed was the one who was born in Texas.  Kind of obscure, though.

All in all, it's not hard for someone who grew up in my day and age.  We learned most of this in school.  Sadly, that no longer seems to be the case.

The Republicans are drooling idiots if they cannot run candidates at all levels - local state, and national - on a platform that says schools that cannot or will not teach should be shut down.  That says schools that cannot or will not teach this American history - who we are, where we came from, and why we are who we are - those schools should be shut down, too.

This will be wildly popular, except with the Intellectual Elite and the public sector unions.  If the GOP isn't willing to pick a very public fight with groups held in such deep contempt by the vast majority of this country, well, then they really are the Stupid Party.

Bridges, home

1990 say the release of a fairly obscure album by Eric Lowen and Dan Navarro, Walking On A Wire.  It's one of my favorite albums, and deserves much wider play than it got.   Lowen and Navarro wrote Pat Benatar's smash hit, We Belong.  Talented songwriters, they began writing and recording for themselves.

One of that album's songs is Seven Bridges.  It is astonishing in how it captures the cycle of our own growth, maturity, and old age.  Particularly astonishing is that it avoids the faux profundity of so much rock music. Looking back after nearly a quarter century, the song still speaks deeply of that voyage from youth to the end of the road.  It combines hope, and defiance, and mature recognition of just what Life is about in a way not often seen.

I'd embed a video, except there doesn't seem to be one.  The album and the song were pretty obscure, and now that Lowen has come down with Lou Gehrig's Disease and retired from performing, it seems that there won't be one.  That seems to add to the poignancy:
Now Life's sometimes a battle,
you just try to get what you're after:
A World filled with stories you won't live to tell.
But going on is all we know - like rivers always flow.
It seems the years just fly right past
while the days go by so slow.

But the feeling that surrounds me
brings the heart back from the stone
and shines a light that lets me see
to cross the seven bridges home.

And it goes like this forever
so don't ever feel alone.
The same old road that brought you here
crosses seven bridges home.
I think that I'll be able to wrap things up at FOB Borepatch in Austin over the nest three or four months, and return home permanently to hearth and home and family.  For the first time in a while, the light in the distance is maybe - maybe - not an oncoming train, but instead shining to let me see to cross the seven bridges home.
A man knows that one day
there's always an end to the Highway.
He knows what's before him
he won't run away.
Because away is never far enough,
and freedom's just a bluff.
But from somewhere down deep inside
comes the peace he's always dreamed of.

And the feeling that surrounds me
brings the heart back from the stone
and shines a light that lets me see
to cross the seven bridges home.
It's not an end, it's a beginning.  But it's true: a man knows what's required of him, and won't flinch from his duty.  You do what has to be done, because it has to be done - despite the cost in heartache and treasure.

Women do this, too, as Mom would be quick to remind me.

Thank you for this song, Eric Lowen and Dan Navarro.  It has been a comfort to me through the years, and especially in the last twelve months.  We can pray for a miracle of modern medicine to stop the ravages of Lowen's affliction.  If that hope is in vain, then may this song of his have as much meaning to him on his journey as it has been to mine.

15,000

All y'all have left over 15,000 comments here.  Well done, all.  I see that I'm not the only one who's a bit chatty ...

But seriously, thank you.  The last year in particular hasn't always been easy - moving, losing Dad, and then living so far from the family for so much of the time.  The comments you've left here has been a very real lifeline during this time.  I'm more grateful than I have words to say.

I must admit that I am not very good at answering comments, certainly not as good as you deserve.  But from my heart, thanks to everyone who comes here.  I look forward to the next 15,000.

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Hitler was right about America

Hitler was contemptuous of American society, seeing us - quite rightly, as it turned out - as a mongrel race.  Americans were descended from peoples from all over the globe, and America did a workable job of assimilating them into a whole, back in the days when the Intellectual Elite wasn't oddly embarrassed to utter the words "melting pot".

That mixing was most obvious to Europeans of the 1930s and 1940s in the music of the day - Jazz and Big Band.  Hitler dismissed it as judenmusik und schwartzmusik - Jewish and Black music (no, he didn't like Benny Goodman or Louis Armstrong).  When Duke Ellington went on a European tour, they needed to get from Belgium to Denmark, and the train went through Germany.  The train had mechanical problems, and the band spent a nervous six hours with the train surrounded by Hitler's soldiers before finally moving on to Scandinavia.  Hitler simply refused to allow these American Schwartze Mongrels to set foot on deutsche boden - German soil.

In a sense, though, Hitler was right to be suspicious of this modern art form as infectious of native European tropes.  More and more in the post war years jazz and blues sound began to seep into native European style.  Edith Piaf was a fairly pure example of French entertainment that would have been familiar to Der Fuhrer, although I never knew that she recorded this in both French and English, around 1950.



But times were changing.  The American cultural advance was relentless, and only fifteen years after the suicides of Hitler and Eva Braun in the Fuhrerbunker, John Coltrain recorded this in Berlin itself:



This song, of course, became Yves Montagne's signature tune.  He was perhaps the first to fuse the old French Piaf style with the new American blues/jazz sound.  This was from probably the late 1960s, at the height of his interpretative powers:



Duke Ellington, of course, had the greatest version of this song, perhaps his revenge on Hitler:



This is actually my favorite version, because of the soft touch approach.  The voice and violin parts are allowed to stand out in front of the orchestra, to sink or swim on their solo talents.  Ozzie Bailey offers a simply spectacular performance in both French and English, and Ray Nance on violin gives what is perhaps the ultimate jazz violin solo of all time.  Quite a performance when you consider that Nance was known for his trumpet work.  Of course, Georgia's own Johnny Mercer translated the lyrics into English.
C'est une chanson qui nous ressemble.
Toi qui m'aimais, et je t'aimais.
Nous vivions tous les deux ensemble
Moi qui t'aimais, toi qui m'aimais.

Mais la vie sépare ceux qui s'aiment.
Tout doucement sans faire de bruit.
Et la mer efface sur le sable
les pas des amants désunis.

The falling leaves drift by the window.
The autumn leaves of red and gold.
I see your lips, the summer kisses.
The sunburned hands I used to hold.

Since you went away the days grow long.
And soon I'll hear old winter's song
But I miss you most of all, my darling
when autumn leaves start to fall.

Maybe that's why I like this version best - it really captures the America Mongrel culture at it's apogee.

Strangely, Google Translate (with a bit of polishing by your humble host) does a fair job of the French - perhaps better than Mercer:
It's a song for us.
You who loved me, I who loved you.
Once we lived together
You who loved me, I who loved you.

Life separates those who love.
But slowly, without a fuss.
And the sea erases from the sand
the footsteps of those who were in love
If you've read this far, then you're perhaps as strange as I.  But thanks.  Chacun à son goût, and all that.

Yeah, I have a hard time winning at Calvinball, too

Thank you, random Internet person!

It's meme time!  Here's mine:

Click to embiggenate.

The link takes you here, to the younger #2 Son, a Mosin, a bayonet, and a Pokemon.  I actually kind of hope that my nieces don't browse there.

So what J. Random Visitor from Al Gore's series of tubes made you laugh out loud?