Sledgehammer's Cycles

Sledgehammer's Cycles
Sledgehammer's Performance and Custom Cycles

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Gun Control advocates: standing athwart the march of history and yelling "stop"

The Left likes to think of themselves as the "Vanguard of History", having seen the future predicted with high levels of accuracy and (surprise!) it all confirms Progressive Dogma.  Gun Control is one of the policies that they're entirely convinced will ultimately prevail, through the march of progress.

As with many things, they're not anywhere near as smart as they think they are:
What does it take for an idea to spread from one to many? For a minority opinion to become the majority belief? According to a new study by scientists at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, the answer is 10%. Once 10% of a population is committed to an idea, it’s inevitable that it will eventually become the prevailing opinion of the entire group. The key is to remain committed.

The research was done by scientists at RPI’s Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center (SCNARC), and published in the journal Physical Review E. Here’s the abstract:
We show how the prevailing majority opinion in a population can be rapidly reversed by a small fraction p of randomly distributed committed agents who consistently proselytize the opposing opinion and are immune to influence. Specifically, we show that when the committed fraction grows beyond a critical value pc=10%, there is a dramatic decrease in the time Tc taken for the entire population to adopt the committed opinion.
We've very likely passed the 10% point - meaning that 10% of the country are committed gun owners.  Probably half of the country are gun owners, and so the only question is what percent of these count as "committed".  The recent panic buying of firearms and ammunition suggest that this is non-negligible.  The recent increase in NRA membership is another.

This explains the anti-gun propaganda campaign.  The reason that the gun banners rely on emotion and misrepresentation (conflating military assault rifles with modern sporting rifles) is because they simply can't get to 10% on their own by logical, intellectual persuasion.

Me, I don't think it matters.  I think we've reached the tipping point, actually some time ago.  The lack of support for new gun control legislation has been clear in polling for several years.  The tide is running and fixing to swamp the gun banners.

They may try to ram their dogma down an unwilling country's throat anyway, as they did with Obamacare.  All this would do is further erode the sense that government has any legitimacy.  Progressives are finding that they're at the end of the Progressive Experiment, in no small part because of that lack of legitimacy.

So what comes next?  Who can tell?  But it will not look like what we see today, a Progressive dream of central control by an educated elite.  And it won't have new gun control.

6 comments:

JD said...

I pray you are right but with attacks at both federal and state level I am not sure. Fienstien may still get this passed as a bipartasan bill if we don't keep hammering DC on it. And being from MA I know my voice in DC is deaf to logic so no help there.

On the good side they have stalled any new gun laws in MA by sending it to multiple committees but it is not dead. I guess it says something that even MA is not rushing through new BS like NY did. . . We need to end this issue so we can move on to focus on important things like fixing our economy and getting folks back to work!

Broken Andy said...

Interesting. This tells me we need to get concealed carry up from 6% to 10%.

New Jovian Thunderbolt said...

Recent WashPost/ABC polling show a clear majority favoring more gun control.

Now, considering the source, I don't trust them. Like I didn't trust their predictions that Obama was gonna win the election, tho.

Borepatch said...

T-Bolt, the only people who think that the WaPo or ABC are unbiased channels are Progressives. They don't have the credibility to move the needle.

And quite frankly, most people ignore the news anyway - not because they think it's biased, but because they don't care.

SlideRuleSlinger said...

This is an interesting result, one I find all the more interesting because G. Korniss (see the authors of the paper) was my Thermodynamics professor at RPI. A very respectable and pleasant man, and a good teacher to boot.

1389 said...

Here's some verbal ammo to help the process along:

Mike Huckabee interviews firearms expert Larry Correia


Larry Correia refutes the gun controllers, once and for all


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ