This will take some explaining, so here goes.
The Democrats were outraged that Clinton won the popular vote in 2016 but Trump won the Electoral College. Lacking the votes for a Constitutional Amendment to eliminate the Electoral College, they came up with a sneaky but very clever idea - get individual States to pass laws giving that State's Electoral Votes to the winner of the national popular vote. I am not a lawyer, so don't know how this would play out in the Courts, but let's run with this idea.
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact binds signatory States to assigning their Electoral Votes to the winner of the national popular vote. The compact comes into force when States representing 270 Electoral Votes have passed the law. Currently States representing 189 EVs have passed the law and it is under consideration in States representing another 116 EVs. So there's quite a good chance that it will come into effect, as the Democrats intended. The States that have passed it or where it has been introduced are shaded light red in the map above. (Note that the dark red States voted for Trump and there's no reason to think they won't next year as well)
So where do I get away with calling a 49 State landslide for Trump? After all, we haven't seen this since Reagan in 1984.
You see, Trump came within a couple million of winning the popular vote: 62,984,828 (Trump) vs. 65,853,514 (Clinton). That's a little over 2% of votes cast. The margin for the Democrats is very thin, and this is using 2016 figures. Now consider Trump's advantages for next year, when compared to 2016:
- He is an incumbent, which is a big advantage. Only five incumbent presidents lost re-election during the 20th Century, and each faced challenges that Trump almost certainly won't: Taft (Teddy Roosevelt split the Republican vote with his Bull Moose Party), Hoover (Great Depression), Ford (only President because Agnew resigned in disgrace and then Nixon resigned after Watergate), Carter (disastrous foreign policy led to Iranian hostage crisis), George H.W. Bush (Ross Perot split the Republican vote). None of these seem remotely plausible, so count on Trump to pick up some popular vote simply due to incumbency.
- Republicans like him more than they did in 2016. A lot of Republicans held their noses when they voted for him in 2016, and presumably some more didn't even come out to vote. Trump was an unknown (from a policy perspective) then; now he has a record to run on, and it is pretty much a solidly Republican record. Sure, his personal style is very unusual, but from a policy perspective he's not at all out of the Republican mainstream. He'll pick up some votes here towards the popular total.
- The economy is doing well. Non-Republicans (mainly independents and blue collar Democrats, but count in a bunch of African-American men) will vote their pocketbooks next year. That's more popular votes for Trump.
- A shockingly weak Democratic field will depress Democratic voter enthusiasm. Each of the Democrats who are running are either non-entities (Castro, Gabbard, Ojeda, Delaney, Yang, Buttigieg, Gillibrand, a bunch of others nobody has ever heard of) or have terrible, exploitable weaknesses: "Creepy Joe" Biden, Fauxahontas, "Lock up the parents when the kids skip school" Harris, Commie Bernie, and the "Fake Hispanic" O'Rourke. Quite frankly, it's hard to see the Democratic base get wound up on any of those, so count that as fewer popular votes for the Democrat, equivalent to more popular votes for Trump.
Remember, Trump only needs a couple million more votes to get all the Electoral Votes from the Popular Vote Compact States. Quite frankly, items 3 and 4 above will get him close, and the others will put him over the top. It's really hard to see that those 4 advantages won't add up to 3 million more votes - like I said, that's 2% of all votes cast.
And so the Democrat's cunning plan will turn around to crush them next year. It's too clever by half. Of course, this all falls apart if there aren't enough other States signing on to the plan to bring the total up to 270 EVs. We'll have to see about that.
















