Thursday, August 6, 2026

IT department's cunning new password security scheme

It put yellow sticky notes with username and password on corporate laptops:

The company decided to take some old laptops and give them out to new users. To make life easy for the recipients, they put sticky notes – everyone’s favorite credential-sharing tool – on the laptops with the name of each employee and their initial login credentials on it.

Let’s just stop for a moment to remark on how bad it is to put usernames and passwords on a piece of paper where the wrong person could see them. Even the IT department should not know your password, should someone in IT themselves turn rogue. So, even if the laptop stayed on a shelf in a closet that only the support staff had access to, having that sticky note would be bad.

However, our situation is even worse because the laptops in question were stored in a conference room while the facilities team finished readying the office for the move. During that time, anyone who had access to the conference room could go in and get multiple user account credentials.

And that's exactly what happened ...
Angels and Ministers of Grace defend us.  And remember - this was the IT Department that did this.

Sigh.

This is why we can't have nice (security) things on the Internet.

Friday, July 31, 2026

"Justice Department" are a bunch of big Poopy Heads

Now I'm a simple guy, one who believes that the Bill of Rights means what it says, and applies even to whack environmentalists who don't like cops.  And so this seems like something that the Courts should swat down:

The U.S. Justice Department is prosecuting an American for allegedly providing U.S. border authorities with a 

The case centers on a feature included in GrapheneOS, a custom Android operating system that runs in place of the software on most modern Google Pixel devices. Tunick’s attorneys confirmed GrapheneOS was running on his phone.

The software feature allows the device owner to set a passcode that deliberately wipes the contents of that device if entered instead of the user’s unlock passcode.

passcode that wiped the contents of his phone, according to an indictment and media reports. 

This is thought to be the first known case in the United States where federal prosecutors have charged someone for the alleged destruction of data using a “duress” password built into a phone’s software.

According to The Guardian, which covered the story earlier this week following the court’s first hearing on Monday, Atlanta resident Samuel Tunick is fighting the charges. Tunick’s attorneys said that it was unlawful for U.S. Customs and Border Protection to seize his phone as he arrived back in the U.S. last year and that any evidence — including the alleged wiping of his phone — should be thrown out.

The Einsteins at DoJ say that the Border Agents didn't need a warrant to search his phone because he "hadn't entered the US" - even though this all took place at Hartsfield Airport in Atlanta.  Oooooooh kaaaaaaay.

It looks like they guy has some pretty high powered legal help - including the Electronic Frontier Foundation - so hopefully the right precedent will get established here: i.e. that the 4th and 5th Amendments mean what they say.

This is all about a software feature called a "Duress Passcode":

The case centers on a feature included in GrapheneOS, a custom Android operating system that runs in place of the software on most modern Google Pixel devices. Tunick’s attorneys confirmed GrapheneOS was running on his phone.

The software feature allows the device owner to set a passcode that deliberately wipes the contents of that device if entered instead of the user’s unlock passcode.

The Border Patrol dudes asked him for his passcode while holding him in durance vile for hours.  Eventually he gave them the Duress Passcode.  

IANAL, but just because he's an activist for anti-cop activities doesn't mean he doesn't have rights.

And yeah, the scare quotes in the post title are intentional.

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

AI Hilarity

Midwest Chick (you do read her every day, don't you?  Thought so.) posts about how a Professor was smarter than most of his students, catching most of them using AI to cheat on an assignment:

A very clever professor in Mississippi decided to test and see if his students were cheating using AI. So he put some code in his exam instructions using white font that couldn’t be seen by the students, but could be seen by an AI if a copy/paste was used. 

Click through for the details (which are hilarious) but even more so for the comments her readers left.  My favorite was one from Carl Bussjaeger:

Oh, yes. I should probably mention DuckDuckGo’s AI. When called out on all of its hallucinations, it informed that if I don’t want it to make s–t up when asking strictly factual questions, I have to specifically TELL it not to make s–t up. 

 Sure you can trust AI.  Just tell it not to make s**t up ...

Sunday, July 26, 2026

The Four Rules, This Time With Emphasis

Just to review.

  • Treat all firearms as if they are loaded.
  • Never point the firearm at anything you are not willing to destroy.
  • Keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to shoot.
  • Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.
  • Today's lesson will focus on the second rule and the problem I have with appendix carry. A holstered firearm in the front of your strong side leg is commonly referred to a "appendix carry". I have always thought it broke the four rules. The muzzle of your firearm, depending on if you are seated, crouched, or standing, will variously be pointed at things you do not want to destroy.

    When another rule is broken, as in the case documented by the shooter below, that bullet is going to find your tender flesh in life altering ways.

    Appendix carry. Just say no. 

     

    Wednesday, July 22, 2026

    Dad Joke CCCLXVIII

    Tuna sends in another one:

    Want to hear 2 short jokes and 1 long one? joke joke Joooooooooke 

    Saturday, July 18, 2026

    When Britannia ruled the waves

    OldAFSarge is (like me) fighting blogger burnout.  He's been posting for 16 years which is quite an accomplishment.  Unlike me, he's put his hand (quite successfully) at military history fiction which takes a whole lot more effort than the Dad Jokes and stuff I put up here.  Besides, OldAFSarge's co-blogger Tuna sends me half of the Dad Jokes anyway.

    So I understand what he's going through.

    But one thing he posted recently was a straight (non-fiction) account of the run up to the Battle of Waterloo, to set the scene for his fiction.  This tickled my memory

    But every time [the French] ended the war, the British would dig deep and come up with more money to finance yet another coalition to fight Napoléon. They had the advantage of their island and the most powerful navy on the planet between them and the French.

    As much as Napoléon wanted to be done with those pesky islanders, he couldn't get to them. The Royal Navy had smashed the combined French and Spanish fleets (huh, the Spanish, I thought the French were their enemies) at Trafalgar. Napoléon was a master of land combat, never did understand the sea. A big advantage the British had was that their navy was constantly at sea, blockading the French and cutting off their trade from the rest of the world. The French mostly sat in port, plotting to drive the Brits off but never getting quite there. Though, for the most part, French ships were better, it ain't the ship, it's the crew. And the Royal Navy had some excellent sailors.

    People don't realize just how much better the Royal Navy was than anyone back in the day.  And yes, it wasn't the ship, it was the crew and especially the leadership.  Nelson's captains were justly famous for their independence and their aggression.

    Heck, half a century earlier Admiral Byng had been shot, not for losing a battle, but rather for not winning it.   Voltaire immortalized this miscarriage of justice in Candide, famously writing "in this country, it is wise to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others." Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres.  The Royal Navy flag officers learned from that.

    Nigel Calder wrote about just how amazing the Royal Navy's performance was in his fantastic book The English Channel. I cannot recommend this book more highly, and it's the book that I have re-read more than any other.  In it, Calder (who was quite an accomplished yachtsman) sailed his ketch all the way up the English channel on the French side, crossed over the Dover Straight, and then sailed it back down the English side.  Along the way he wrote about the geology, seascape, history, and current events (from 1986) all along the way.  The book is a complete delight.

    He starts off in Brittany at the far Atlantic end of the French coast.  The great French port of Brest was there, but Calder points out that in the age of sail the port was a trap for the French fleet because the prevailing wind was from the west.  Because of the difficulty of a sailing ship sailing against the wind, the Royal Navy was able to blockade the French for years.  Calder describes just how amazing a feat of seamanship this was:

    The Revolutionary and  Napoleonic wars spanned eighteen years, with only two short breaks.  During most of that time there were British warships off Brest.   To begin with they were only frigates, but later the British fleet remained at sea off Ushant winter and summer, in a patient demonstration of seamanship.  When the wind blew hard from the west, the British ships beat their way out into the Atlantic, or even ran for shelter in Tor Bay on the English coast, confident that the French could not leave harbour against the wind.  But whenever the weather was suitable for a breakout, the blockading fleet closed to within sight of the French shore.

    ...

    In 1805 the conquest of England was Napoleon's first priority.  The main responsibility lay with the fleet at Brest, and its commander Honoré-Joseph-Antonin Ganteaume.  The duty of preventing the adventure belonged to William Cornwallis, who was in charge of the Channel Fleet blockading Brest.  Cornwallis was known as Blue Billy because of his determination to remain at sea.  If a gale forced his ships to run for shelter and replenishment in Tor Bay, the fleet was no sooner anchored than the flagship Hibernia would run up the blue signal flag denoting an imminent departure.

    The preparations for the invasion were grandiose.  Shipyards from The Netherlands to western France built nearly 2000 barges to carry 100,000 troops, complete with their guns and horses.  The naval plan required all the fleets, from Brest, Rochefort in Biscay, Ferrol in Spain, and Toulon in the Mediterranean, to break out and rendezvous in the West Indies.  The idea was to draw the British fleets to the wrong side of the Atlantic and to mass the French and Spanish ships for a dash back to the undefended English Channel.

    ...

    On July 22 an inconclusive battle took place in fog off northern Spain, between a British force under Robert Calder [no relation to the author Calder - Borepatch] and Villeneuve's stronger fleet.  Calder was court-martialed for capturing only two ships.  Villeneuve received exhortations from Napoléon to free the fleet from Brest and sweep all before him.

    If you give us control for three days, nay, even for twenty four hours, your task will be done: all is ready, Europe awaits breathless on this great event.
    Villeneuve chose instead to retreat to southern Spain, and the Brest fleet stayed put.  During these alarms, the British blockading force was reduced to fifteen ships of the line as compared with twenty five in Brest.  Ganteaume thought he could shoot his way out but he was forbidden to sail because a major naval battle was not what Napoleon had in mind.  While the British sacked Calder for failing to wipe out a superior force, the French would not let Ganteaume take his chance with a weaker one.  Different attitudes to sea power, evolved in hundreds of years of warfare in the English Channel, decided the outcome.

    ...

    A week later the truth dawned on Napoleon that Villeneuve was timid and Ganteaume was never going to get out.  The Emperor ordered the Grand Army to march from the English Channel to the Danube where British diplomats had stirred up trouble for him.  The small craft of the invasion fleet were docked and the crews disbanded.  The attack on England had been called off.    The blockading fleet's task lacked the drama of a major sea battle like Camperdown where the British had crushed the Dutch eight years earlier, but it decided the final contest at sea between the British and the French.  The American naval historian Alfred Mahan [yes, that Alfred Mahan of "fleet in being" fame - Borepatch] wrote:
    Never in the history of blockades has there been excelled, if even equaled, the close locking of Brest by Admiral Cornwallis, both winter and summer, between the outbreak of war and the battle of Trafalgar.  It excited not only the admiration but the wonder of contemporaries.

    If you like OldAFSarge's military history fiction, you will like Calder's book.  It's part tourist guide, part history, part sailing log.  Like I said, I've re-read this book more than any other I own.  Highly, highly recommended.

    And go leave OldADSarge some commenty love

    Thursday, July 16, 2026

    Armor Piercing ammo

    Jacob e3mails to point out an interesting article discussing the various AP rounds that the Department of War uses. If you're interested in this sort of thing, you'll find this interesting.

    The one thing that the article doesn't discuss is the type of "Armor Piercing" ammunition that normal citizens can get.  There's a brief discussion of this on this Reddit thread. (Yeah, yeah, I know - Reddit.  But the info seems reasonable)

    He also has an interesting post up comparing .300 Blackout with 5.56 NATO

    Wednesday, July 15, 2026

    Bayeux Tapestry back in England for first time in 900 years

    This is cool:

    After a secret trip across the English Channel, the Bayeux Tapestry is back on English soil for the first time since it was made 900 years ago. It has been loaned to the British Museum by France after a major conservation project to stabilize the fragile textile

    ...

    The wool thread embroidery-on-linen tapestry created as a visual record of the William of Normandy’s invasion of England in 1066, was woven in the Canterbury area around 1077. It was commissioned by Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, William the Conqueror’s brother, so when it was complete, the tapestry moved to Normandy and has stayed there ever since.

    ...

    It will be exhibited at the British Museum from September 10, 2026, until July 2027. Pre-sales of tickets are already through the roof, with 100,000 sold since tickets for the first four months of the exhibition went on sale July 1.

    In exchange for the loan of one of the greatest historic artifacts in French and English history, museums in Normandy will be loaned of the British Museum’s most famous objects, including pieces from the Sutton Hoo Anglo-Saxon ship burial and the Lewis Chessmen.

    The tapestry is so famous that people make memes using it.

     

    If you're planning a trip to London in the next year, this should be on your list to see.  Or you can go see it in Bayeux  in Normandy and see the D-Day beaches.

    Tuesday, July 14, 2026

    Dad Joke CCCLXVII - I was told there would be no math

    Did you know that 10 + 10 is the same as 11 + 11?

    10 + 10 is twenty; 11 + 11 is twenty, too.

    (From The Queen Of The World) 

    Saturday, July 11, 2026

    This blog is old enough to vote

    Actually it has been for a couple of weeks.  I've had a pretty bad case of blogger burnout - there's been a number of blog worthy topics and I just haven't been feeling it.

    Meh. 

    Still, 14425 posts and 54948 comments is pretty decent.  Especially the comments.

    Thanks to everyone who stops by. 

    Saturday, July 4, 2026

    Wednesday, July 1, 2026

    World Cup

     The parts of the world using the metric system refer to the sport as football. The United States calls it soccer. I don't mind the sport. It looks like an excuse to do a lot of running and occasionally to practice your acting skills when someone bumps you. I don't follow it, but I'm an equal opportunity sports ignorer. I'm not following pro football, basketball, golf or tennis, either.

    However, I saw in the news that Australia lost to the United States 2-0 and Australians are saying it is the most embarrassing thing ever. Short memory down under, eh?




    Tuesday, June 23, 2026

    The UK is a failed state

    With the resignation of Sir Kier "Two Tier" Starmer, the UK is poised for its seventh Prime Minister in ten years.  That's what happen in failed states.

    [Homer Simpson] The seventh Prime Minister in ten years so far.[/Homer Simpson] 

    Busted Knuckles has an unimprovable sendoff for Sir Kier. 

    Saturday, June 20, 2026

    Country music for Father's Day

    Tomorrow is Father's Day here in the States.  I don't know where you are but this is what's Top Of Mind here.

    From a musical perspective only Country Music really speaks to this.  But it speaks in different voices as your kids grow up.  Yeah, Country music takes you on that journey.

    Three chords and the Truth. 

    When they're young

    This is the easiest time for fathers.  Trace Adkins sang about this better than anyone.  I posted about this a long, long time ago.  Reader Mark left a comment there:

    The other day my oldest son, who is a freshman at UND (North Dakota, not that other 'ND') asked me if I remembered taking him, and a couple of his friends to Pizza Hut for lunch one day. He remembered it like it was yesterday. I lied to him. I told him I did, and I feel terrible about it.

    Folks, it's not what we recall, it's what our kids do.

     

    Amen, and amen.

    The Queen Of The World likes this one.  I think it reminds her of the time her Daddy took her fishing and she won the tournament.

    When they grow up

    Yeah it sucks, but kids grow up, and have to find their place in the world.  Sometimes that means pushing back against The Man. As I posted at the time:

    For years, Dad and I wouldn't talk.  I had a lot of anger in me then, and it came out in strange ways.  Bad ways.  Sorry, I won't talk about what happened with #1 Son, but that he came out right side up didn't have much to do with me.

    This Father's Day weekend, I think on both of those.

    Growing up, I knew that my Dad was a great father.  He set an example: he was a fine provider, although we didn't grow up with a lot.  Not wealthy, not weepin'.  He was someone who I could look up to, never doubting for an instant that we were everything to him.  He adored Mom.  And so it was a terrible shock to find out, in my forties, that he was made of flesh and blood.  For a while, I couldn't forgive him for that.

    I like to think of myself as a smart guy, and I must confess that it's very nice indeed when someone refers to me as a "wickid smaht bahstid".  But I sure was an idiot when it mattered.  Like Dad, I found - perhaps for the first time - that I, too, was mere flesh and blood.  Full of Foolish Pride, and driving myself into a ditch.

    I'll swallow my pride if you will. 

    That post is worth reading. 


    Sometimes they don't come back

    We ask a lot of our sons.  Some times we we ask them to to go to far away places.  Sometimes they don't come back.


    Reflections on Father's Day

    I remember this being hard to write.  It's hard to read now.

    What I remember the most about being a father is is this:

    Your children are not your children.
    They are the sons and daughters of Life's longing for itself.
    They come through you but not from you,
    And though they are with you yet they belong not to you.

    You may give them your love but not your thoughts,
    For they have their own thoughts.
    You may house their bodies but not their souls,
    For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow,
    which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.
    You may strive to be like them,
    but seek not to make them like you.
    For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.

    You are the bows from which your children
    as living arrows are sent forth.
    The Archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite,
    and He bends you with His might
    that His arrows may go swift and far.
    Let your bending in the Archer's hand be for gladness;
    For even as He loves the arrow that flies,
    so He loves also the bow that is stable.

    - Kalil Gibran, The Prophet

     So let it be written.  So let it be done.

    Friday, June 19, 2026

    The surprisingly reinvigorated Second Amendment

    Next week this blog turns 18 (!).  That's a milestone that makes you think back on the journey.

    This journey began in the lead up to the release by the US Supreme Court of the Heller v. District of Columbia opinion - in other words, this blog pre-dates Heller.  Looking back on the last 18 years here, things are really different for the Second Amendment.

    It's all well and good to have a Constitution that's written down in black and white, but that doesn't help much if the Legislatures ignore it and the Courts refuse to strike down infringing laws.  That has changed, and while there are still pieces of broken Gun Control on the floor needing to be swept up, the change is profound.  Let's take a quick recap on that and then talk about what it means.

    Heller v. D.C. (2008) stated as the plain law of the land that Second Amendment rights apply to individuals, not just to State Militias.  It kind of seems ridiculous to actually have to write this today, but that was the "accepted" legal understanding prior to Heller.

    McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) held that Heller applied not just to the District of Columbia, but to all the States (via the 14th Amendment).

    New York Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) was the hammer blow.  It established that the meaning of the Second Amendment as it was understood at the time was what it really meant, and that gun control laws had to demonstrate that the laws are consistent with that.  This flipped the switch - no longer would citizens have to demonstrate that they have a right, but the government has to demonstrate that they don't.  

    This is what has left all those broken pieces of Gun Control cluttering up the floor.  Sure, they still need to be swept up, but look where things are now:

    1. Gun permitting is not dead, but it's coughing up blood.  "Shall Issue" permitting is the law of the land - governments have to prove that you shouldn't be allowed to carry rather than you justify why do need to.
    2. Most States were "May Issue" (you had to justify why you needed a permit, and the Goverment might - or might not - issue one) in 1990.  None are today.  In fact, half the States don't require you to have any permit at all to carry a firearm. 
    3. "Assault Weapons" Bans are the last refuge of the desperate.  Liberal Legislatures that pass these today know for certain that they will be struck down.  Increasingly, the Courts are imposing restraining orders preventing the laws from going into force while they are being litigates.
    4. The National Firearms Act of 1934 is a pale shadow of its former self.  Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" (which was anything but) repealed the tax on suppressors.  The Tax Code is really the main way for the Fed.Gov to impose the law here; no tax, no law.

    So what does all this mean?  The biggest advancement in Second Amendment rights has been the normalization of the idea of firearms.  The biased media has a really hard time today in painting us as a fringe community. 

    Heck, SCOTUS just ruled that the Fed.Gov cannot prevent firearms purchases by people who smoke pot.  The ruling was unanimous.  Conservative Alito and liberal Kagan co-authored a concurring opinion.  It's cats and dogs living together.

    This has even been absorbed by the lower courts - the District and Circuit Courts of Appeals.  It's great if SCOTUS makes a ruling, but if the lower courts don't enforce it then it doesn't carry much weight.  We saw a fair amount of this during the years after Heller.  Now we don't.  Sure, there will always be the rogue District Judge who allows a plainly infringing gun control law, but these are getting struck down on appeal.

    We're no longer the weirdos, the weirdos are on the other side.  The Class War against gun owners is pretty much over.

    That's one heck of a change in 18 years.


     

    Monday, June 15, 2026

    Science is not magic

    Divemedic has a must-read post about what science is and is not.  Quite frankly, it is a brital - and much needed - takedown of "Trust the Science".  I won't excerpt any of it because you need to read the whole thing, but he includes example after example of "Settled Science" which resulted in horrifying tragedy.  Some of these won the Nobel Prize in Medicine, for crying out loud.

    Yes, he also talks about COVID without belaboring it.

    However, in his excellent discussion about science as a process, he does not (much) delve into what happens to that process when it gets corrupted by moneyed interests.  ClimateGate was perhaps the gold standard of that, explained spectacularly by Dr. Richard Muller from UC Berkeley's Earth Sciences Department.


    There are two things to point out here: Dr. Muller is not one of those beastly Science Deniers like your humble host, be is a professional climate scientist and the driving force behind a climate database that is less corrupt than the others - the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature series.

    The second thing to point out is the guy at the center of the ClimateGate scandal - and the scientist who Muller will no longer read papers published by him - was one of the Lead Authors of the IPCC Assessment Reports.  These are supposedly the gold standard science, and it is entirely corrupt.

    Scientist Hal Lewis explained why the establishment keeps doing this in his spectacular resignation from the American Physical Society (basically the professional association of Sheldon Coopers):

    I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise.
    Emphasis from me. 

    There is a reason that I have post tags for junk science and climate bullshit. There's a reason that there are dozens or hundreds of posts tagged with those.  The science was bought and paid for, just like Divemedic's nutrition science example.

    It's ironic that what is finally killing Global Warming is the manic push for AI datacenters.  The big money is on to chasing a better graft.

    Go and read

    Friday, June 12, 2026

    Dad Joke CCCLXVI - Dad Joke, Mom Joke

    Dad Joke: If a cow doesn't produce milk, is it a Milk Dud?  

    Mom Joke (Courtesy of The Queen Of The World): No, it's just lactose-free.


    Tuesday, June 2, 2026

    Seen around the house

    Deuce, our Grand-dog.  10 weeks old, so he's still a baby.  We're going to do some training.

    I'm not a fan of his name.  I have half a mind to call him Duce (like Mussolini).

    Saturday, May 30, 2026

    Summer is boating season

    May as well have a really cool boat

     
    Most boats are a carefully considered compromise designed to cover as many bases as possible: floating holiday home, party island, offshore cruiser – jack of all trades, as the saying has it, master of none.

    Safehaven Marine’s Barracuda SV11 eschews all those compromises, becoming the jack of a single trade, master of one. Its single dedicated purpose is to conquer rough water and transport its crew safely, regardless of conditions.

    ...

    There are no hot tubs, no teak deck option, no rise and fall TV. But there is a rise and fall gyro stabilised machine gun platform that emerges from the foredeck, controlled from the wheelhouse. Bulletproofing and a gun rack for the AK47s are also on the menu, should its customer base require it. 

    Oh, and it's a stealth boat. 

    Friday, May 29, 2026

    Boston, amirite?

    It seems like this is something being pushed by the Boston.Gov:


    I'm afraid I don't even understand what they're talking about.  Does this mean dudes in dresses learning about periods, or the other way around?  Quite frankly, the terminology may be intentionally confusing.  Just shut up and nod your head, right?

    Oooooh kaaaay.

    I am SO glad I got out of there. Didn't even get cut up too badly going over the wire at the border ...