All they have to do is forbid the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) from publishing temperature data that has been changed from the original value recorded on the date of recording.
That's it. Overnight, five sixths of the reported warming in the US over the twentieth century will simply disappear.
Of course, the Usual Suspects will scream and holler about this, but that will simply focus more attention on the subject. Quite frankly, the public will very likely be shocked when they find out that scientists simply change the data after it was recorded. There will be a collapse of trust in the climate scientists. Quite frankly, that collapse of trust will have been earned many times over.
Shocking evidence has emerged that points to the U.K. Met Office inventing temperature data from over 100 non-existent weather stations. The explosive allegations have been made by citizen journalist Ray Sanders and sent to the new Labour Science Minister Peter Kyle MP. Following a number of Freedom of Information requests to the Met Office and diligent field work visiting individuals stations, Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302 sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
Now this happens here as well, for example the decommissioned weather station at Ripogenus Dam in Maine was providing data for over a decade. But what is going on in the UK is on an industrial scale.
So if the "Climate Crisis" is such a big deal, why is a third of the temperature data in the UK fabricated? It's fake, just like the "Global Warming" crisis.
Interpol is reporting a big win after a massive combined operation against online criminals made 41 arrests and seized hardware thought to be used for nefarious purposes.
Operation Synergia II – the follow up to the first Synergia raids that were announced in February – saw cops in 95 countries crack down on phishers, ransomware extortionists, and information thieves around the world. The operation was carried out in conjunction with the corporate world, specifically Group-IB, Trend Micro, Kaspersky and Team Cymru.
In addition to the arrests, Interpol revealed 65 people are still under investigation and claimed to have shuttered 22,000 IP addresses, taken control of 59 servers and 43 other computing devices.
For the longest time much of the media has fed us the idea that “union = overpaid/lazy/bad”. Now we should all have the following ingrained in our skulls by now, “the media lies”.
Proceeding from that “law” (it really should be a scientific law at this point) we can deduce that the media is lying about unions. The real question to ask ourselves is, “why?”
Designed for those who wish to take their passion for the venerable M1 Garand to the next level, the Advanced Maintenance Class (AMC) held in Anniston, Alabama, offers students a unique opportunity to receive unparalleled training from our knowledgeable Custom Shop Staff and build their very own M1 Rifle.
RANDOM DRAWING ENTRY WINDOW AND PROCESS
Due to limited spaces and high demand, CMP will hold a random drawing to select participants. Interested individuals may enter the Random Drawing between November 1, 2024 and December 31, 2024.
If this is your bag, baby, then get on over there.
Four members of the now-defunct REvil ransomware operation have been sentenced to several years in prison in Russia, marking one of the rare instances where cybercriminals from the country have been convicted of hacking and money laundering charges.
Russian news publication Kommersant reported that a court in St. Petersburg found Artem Zaets, Alexei Malozemov, Daniil Puzyrevsky, and Ruslan Khansvyarov guilty of illegal circulation of means of payment. Puzyrevsky and Khansvyarov have also been found guilty of using and distributing malware.
...
REvil, which was once one of the most prolific ransomware groups, was dismantled after Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) announced arrests against several members in an unprecedented takedown.
They aren't just going to prison, they're going to a Russian prison. More of this, please.
So their live streaming of the Mike Tyson fight last night was an unmitigated disaster. But come on - you'd think that Netflix IT would understand how to spin up capacity to meet demand. Maybe their replacements will.
For those who like the Sweet Science (or who used to), this is a fascinating episode from Hard Core History about how boxing has changed over time, mostly for the worse. Dan Carlin interviews Mike Silver, author of The Arc of Boxing which is a terrific read. I'm in general agreement with both the podcast and the book, although have to admit that I quite enjoyed the Barrios/Ramos bout last night. It had a very Friday Night Fights feel to it.
A 25-year-old man in Ontario, Canada has been arrested for allegedly stealing data from and extorting more than 160 companies that used the cloud data service Snowflake.
On October 30, Canadian authorities arrested Alexander Moucka, a.k.a. Connor Riley Moucka of Kitchener, Ontario, on a provisional arrest warrant from the United States. Bloomberg first reported Moucka’s alleged ties to the Snowflake hacks on Monday.
...
In a statement on Moucka’s arrest, Mandiant said UNC5537 aka Alexander ‘Connor’ Moucka has proven to be one of the most consequential threat actors of 2024.
Too bad we can't send him to a Russian prison, nyet?
On Saturday, an Associated Press investigation revealed that OpenAI's Whisper transcription tool creates fabricated text in medical and business settings despite warnings against such use. The AP interviewed more than 12 software engineers, developers, and researchers who found the model regularly invents text that speakers never said, a phenomenon often called a "confabulation" or "hallucination" in the AI field.
Upon its release in 2022, OpenAI claimed that Whisper approached "human level robustness" in audio transcription accuracy. However, a University of Michigan researcher told the AP that Whisper created false text in 80 percent of public meeting transcripts examined. Another developer, unnamed in the AP report, claimed to have found invented content in almost all of his 26,000 test transcriptions.
Of course, they use it because it's cheaper than paying a human transcriber. So riddle me this, Healthcare Administrator: what do you call yet another AI that lies all the time? A day that ends in "-day".
While the vast majority of people over 50 look for health information on the internet, a new poll shows 74% would have very little or no trust in such information if it were generated by artificial intelligence.
Meanwhile, 20% of older adults have little or no confidence that they could spot misinformation about a health topic if they came across it.
That percentage was even higher among older adults who say their mental health, physical health or memory is fair or poor, and among those who report having a disability that limits their activities. In other words, those who might need trustworthy health information the most were more likely to say they had little or no confidence they could spot false information.
People are smart enough to catch a whiff of marketing Bravo Sierra.
From now on I will start asking all of my healthcare providers if they do transcription, and if so whether they use AI for the transcription. If they do I will demand to review the transcript. If they won't, I'll get a different provider.
A journalist with the London Telegraph has been visited unannounced at her home by police in the UK who told her they are investigating a “non-crime hate incident” over a tweet she posted a year ago.
...
Allison Pearson relates what happened on Sunday in an article, noting that police will not tell her which post is the subject of the investigation, nor will they tell her who her accuser is or what they feel offended about.
Well okay, then.But the UK Plods seems to have forgotten the old saying to not mess with someone who buys ink by the barrel:
Way to shine a spotlight on your policy, dumbasses. Streisand Effect much?
I've been a bit startled by the unhinged reaction by so many Democrats to Trump's rather resounding victory. Probably I shouldn't be - after all the lesson of Facebook (and most social media) proves the old adage that it's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than it is to open it and remove all doubt.
Sure, I've been wrong all the time in the past (click on the tag for polls - often wrong but at least I showed my work). But when things didn't go my way it was a shrug and get on to what's next. That's not what we see at all.
Sure, the Democrats never really talked much about issues that most people care about - are you better off than you were four years ago, that sort of thing. Instead, for the last four years it's been OrangeManBad, and nothing but OrangeManBad. Now they are standing amidst the destruction of their hopes as the Great Orange Whale swims off to the White House.
Maybe it's time to reread that novel, and an exercise in understanding the broken political philosophy of the Democrats. But then again, I don't think that *I* need to reread it.
They do.
Absurdum est ut alios regat, qui seipsum regere nescit.
It is absurd that a man should rule over others, who cannot rule himself.
It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given us Freedom of the Press. It's the soldier, not the poet, who has given us Freedom of Speech. It's the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given us the Freedom to Demonstrate. It's the soldier, not the lawyer, who has given us the Right to a Fair Trial. It's the soldier who salutes the flag, serves under the flag and whose coffin is draped by the flag, Who gives the protestor the right he abuses to burn the flag.
Only two Presidents have been elected to non-consecutive terms. The first was Grover Cleveland who served as 22nd (in 1884) and 24th (in 1892) Presidential terms (his two terms interrupted by Benjamin Harrison in 1888 even though Cleveland won the popular vote). Long time readers will know that Cleveland is very much a Friend of the Blog, being listed as one of the top US Presidents since forever.
The second, of course, is Donald Trump - Presidential terms 45 and (now) 47. We will see how history rates his two terms; 45 was pretty successful but with a lot of important stuff left undone. His great Presidential flaw was the people he appointed do implement his policies where they often submarined him.
We will see how much he learned from that. Glen Reynolds posts some interesting ideas (you should absolutely read the whole thing; it's certain that Trump's people have):
Last time around, Trump squandered his momentum. He passed the tax bill that the establishment GOP wanted, after which they didn’t need anything from him and turned to obstructing him. Here’ssomethingI wrote in 2017:
Like airplanes on a runway. Trump’s approach this time around should be what he should have done last time: Shock and awe. Shut down departments, fire bureaucrats, exercise emergency powers, all so fast that the establishment’s responses are saturated. Javier Millei’s whirlwind assault in Argentina should be the model, sometimes in specifics but also in general approach. Bureaucrats move slowly; Trump should move fast.
Elon Musk says he can cut $2 trillion easily; do it. Also, set bureaucrats competing with each other for what funds remain. Divide and conquer.
The interesting question here is how you scale this throughout all the
Federal Agencies. I think the answer is to use business-as-usual:
different offices play office politics against each other to get budget
and headcount. That's how the game is played. So set up an incentive
structure for Office A to rat our Office B's inefficiencies and
duplications to save their own skins. I expect that this would pay big
dividends.
So we shall see what we shall see. The results from last night were not the landslide I was sort of expecting (although it was a solid win). I expect there was some cheating but nothing like what we saw in 2020 - because as I've been saying, party apparatchiks saw the same Preference Cascade forming and a lot fewer were willing to risk jail to cheat for a loser.
But like Donald Trump, the USA dodged a bullet last night.
Well, and our precinct, at least. I'm not sure what that means - there's no way that Kamala Harris will win deep red Manatee County, Florida. But Republican voters seem eager to turn out and vote.
No, it's not because Harris is mad as a hatter on the Green New Deal or because Trump will kill all of this off - although both are entirely correct. No, this is thinking about the polling which shows the race to be neck and neck even though it is anything but.
Long time readers know how I bang on and on about the hideous data problems in today's Climate Science. I've been doing this for fifteen years - this post may not be the earliest where I delved into the problems in the climate databases, but it's one of the earliest. How To Create A Consensus On Global Warming:
We keep hearing people tell us that there is a "consensus" that the
planet is warming, because the "science is settled". Longtime readers
know my feelings on the latter, so there's no need to rehash old
arguments. Instead, I'd like to look at how one might go about
manufacturing a consensus. It's actually not hard.
Step 1: Change the data
[lots of details on data manipulation and shenanigans removed]
We see this in high fidelity in the polls for this election. There are a million ways to manipulate the polls to give you the results you want, such as estimates of Republican vs. Democrat turnout. In essence, I'm not objecting so much to the results of the polls, but rather to the assumptions that go into the sausage-making machine. Change the assumptions, change the output.
But my old post also highlights a key issue in play on today's polls:
Step 2. Fund only scientific research that confirms warming.
Who is paying for these polls, and what are their agendas? Quite frankly, we don't know either of these but the polls are acting in very close agreement. You could look at that as a measure of accuracy, or you could look at that as an outcome of the agendas - such as shaping public opinion and expectations.
Now I may just be nasty and suspicious but there is a way that we can test whether my suspicions hold water. It's the same thing we can do with Climate Science, to validate what we hear from the establishment scientists. All we have to do is ask a simple question: if the data are so settled, do we see lots of corroborating evidence or do we see a lot of evidence contradicting the establishment view?
In both cases, we see a lot of evidence contradicting the official narrative.
For example, for Global Warming, we see all sots of non-warming things:
You would think that if the science really were so settled that evidence for Global Warming would be falling off the trees. It's not.
And so with evidence for a "neck and neck election". If it were so settled - after all, essentially all polls say exactly that - then why all the evidence that says it's not?
Donald Trump campaigns for Arab-American vote in Detroit
LA Times, Washington Post, Gannet refuse to endorse Harris
All the betting sites have Trump not just ahead, but way ahead.
Even the crooked polls have Harris neck-and-neck, where both Hillary and Biden were up by 5 or 6
Barack Obama is trying to shame Black men to vote for Harris. And it's not working.
If it were a neck and neck race, you'd see a bunch of these on Harris' side, too. You don't.
Remember, we're in the middle of a preference cascade. Don't pay any attention to the polls which are trying to gaslight you. Pay attention to what you see with your own eyes. And as to the "margin of cheat" you can believe that a bunch of Democrat operatives are doing exactly that right now, and wondering if they want to risk 10 years in Club Fed to try to push a loser across the finish line. A bunch of them will take a hard pass on that.
