I had missed that Denver prosecutors dropped all charges against Matthew Dolloff in the shooting death of Lee Keltner in October 2020. Who is Matthew Dolloff, I hear you ask? The dude holding the heater here:
This was a protest where two sides stood off against each other. Words led to shoving and Dolloff shot Keltner graveyard dead. You can see Dolloff's slide pushed back and smoke from the propellant making a bee-line towards Keltner's head. If you zoom way in there's a black dot that may or may not be the bullet right above Keltner's wrist.
So was this a good shoot or a bad shoot?
To answer this we need to put aside which "side" each was on. Keltner was Patriot Front, Dolloff may or may not have been Antifa but does seem to have been BLM. But quite frankly none of this matters. From the DA's statement:
As the case progressed - and a full analysis of the case details including materials provided by defense counsel was made - prosecutors realized that they would not be able to prove that Mr. Dolloff did not have the right to use deadly force to defend himself and others pursuant to Colorado law.
... without provocation, Mr. Keltner verbally threatened and physically assaulted Mr. Dolloff and was the initial aggressor before being shot. Under Colorado's law, Matthew Dolloff had no duty to retreat and was legally justified in his actions. While I do not agree with Mr. Dolloff's decision to use lethal force, the fact remains he had the right to do so under our law.
This may be some of the reason that the DA said that (images from the UK Sun newspaper):
Just a face slap, right? Well, maybe - Keltner had a can of bear spray in his right hand here. Mace may or may not be considered Deadly Force (some places it is, some places it isn't). But here's the thing - look at the vertical chain link fence support right behind Keltner in the picture immediately above, then look at where that same fence support is in the first picture: clearly both men had stepped back. While Colorado law says you have no duty to retreat, both men backed up.
So bad shoot?
Maybe not. Look at the position of both men as Dolloff was drawing his pistol:
Kelter has taken a step back as he sees Dolloff drawing, but Dolloff has stepped way back. Kelter seems absolutely to have been the aggressor, physically assaulting Dolloff and holding what may (or may not) be considered a deadly weapon in Colorado, but which is definitely considered a deadly weapon elsewhere.
So good (justified) shoot? Remember, these pictures are from the video which means that the first and last are separated by a second, maybe two. When things go bad, they go bad all of a sudden.
I don't know whether this was a good shoot or a bad one, but the DA seems to think so. Maybe the DA in on the side of the "bad guys" but I don't think we should "flip the scrip" because Kelter was "on our side" and Dolloff wasn't. Rule of law is a street that runs both ways - or should, when the range goes hot.
Feel free to comment with your opinion.