There's a proposed bill to require bloggers to register and self report monthly to the state if they are are blogging about the governor, attorney general, or other members of the Florida executive cabinet or legislature.
Not a law yet, but a bill. Here's the pertinent section:
Section 3. Section 286.31, Florida Statutes, is created to 137 read: 138 286.31 Blogger registration and reporting.— 139 (1) As used in this section, the term: 140 (a) “Blog” means a website or webpage that hosts any 141 blogger and is frequently updated with opinion, commentary, or 142 business content. The term does not include the website of a 143 newspaper or other similar publication. 144 (b) “Blogger” means any person as defined in s. 1.01(3) 145 that submits a blog post to a blog which is subsequently 146 published. 147 (c) “Blog post” is an individual webpage on a blog which 148 contains an article, a story, or a series of stories. 149 (d) “Compensation” includes anything of value provided to a 150 blogger in exchange for a blog post or series of blog posts. If 151 not provided in currency, it must be the fair-market value of 152 the item or service exchanged. 153 (e) “Elected state officer” means the Governor, the 154 Lieutenant Governor, a Cabinet officer, or any member of the 155 Legislature. 156 (f) “Office” means, in the context of a blog post about a 157 member of the Legislature, the Office of Legislative Services 158 or, in the context of a blog post about a member of the 159 executive branch, the Commission on Ethics, as applicable. 160 (2) If a blogger posts to a blog about an elected state 161 officer and receives, or will receive, compensation for that 162 post, the blogger must register with the appropriate office, as 163 identified in paragraph (1)(f), within 5 days after the first 164 post by the blogger which mentions an elected state officer. 165 (3)(a) Upon registering with the appropriate office, a 166 blogger must file monthly reports on the 10th day following the 167 end of each calendar month from the time a blog post is added to 168 the blog, except that, if the 10th day following the end of a 169 calendar month occurs on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, 170 the report must be filed on the next day that is not a Saturday, 171 Sunday, or legal holiday. 172 (b) If the blogger does not have a blog post on a blog 173 during a given month, the monthly report for that month does not 174 need to be filed. 175 (c) The blogger must file reports with the appropriate 176 office using the electronic filing system: 177 1. As provided in s. 11.0455 if the blog post concerns an 178 elected member of the Legislature; or 179 2. As provided in s. 112.32155 if the blog post concerns an 180 officer of the executive branch. 181 (d) The reports must include all of the following: 182 1. The individual or entity that compensated the blogger 183 for the blog post. 184 2. The amount of compensation received from the individual 185 or entity, regardless of how the compensation was structured. 186 a. The amount must be rounded to the nearest $10 increment. 187 b. If the compensation is for a series of blog posts or for 188 a defined period of time, the blogger must disclose the total 189 amount to be received upon the first blog post being published. 190 Thereafter, the blogger must disclose the date or dates 191 additional compensation is received, if any, for the series of 192 blog posts. 193 3. The date the blog post was published. If the blog post 194 is part of a series, the date each blog post is published must 195 be included in the applicable report. 196 4. The website and website address where the blog post can 197 be found. 198 (4) Notwithstanding any other law, a magistrate is 199 authorized to enter a final order in determination of the 200 reasonableness of circumstances for an untimely filing of a 201 required report and the amount of a fine, if any. 202 (5) Each house of the Legislature and the Commission on 203 Ethics shall adopt by rule, for application to bloggers, the 204 same procedure by which lobbyists are notified of the failure to 205 timely file a report and the amount of the assessed fines. The 206 rule must also provide for, but need not be limited to, the 207 following provisions: 208 (a) A fine of $25 per day per report for each day late, not 209 to exceed $2,500 per report. 210 (b) Upon receipt of an untimely filed report, the amount of 211 the fine must be based upon the earlier of the following: 212 1. The date and time that the untimely report is actually 213 received by the office. 214 2. The date and time on the electronic receipt issued 215 pursuant to s. 11.0455 or s. 112.32155. 216 (c) The fine must be paid within 30 days after the notice 217 of payment due is transmitted, unless an appeal is filed with 218 the office. The fine amount must be deposited into: 219 1. If the report in question relates to a post about a 220 member of the Legislature, the Legislative Lobbyist Registration 221 Trust Fund; 222 2. If the report in question relates to a post about a 223 member of the executive branch, the Executive Branch Lobby 224 Registration Trust Fund; or 225 3. If the report in question relates to a post about 226 members of both the Legislature and the executive branch, the 227 lobbyist registration trust funds identified in subparagraphs 1. 228 and 2., in equal amounts. 229 (d) A fine may not be assessed against a blogger the first 230 time a report for which the blogger is responsible is not timely 231 filed. However, to receive this one-time fine waiver, all 232 untimely filed reports for which the blogger remains responsible 233 for filing must be filed with the office within 30 days after 234 the notice of untimely filing was transmitted to the blogger. A 235 fine must be assessed for any subsequent late-filed reports. 236 (e) The blogger is entitled to appeal a fine, based upon 237 reasonable circumstances surrounding the failure to file by the 238 designated date, by making a written request to the office for a 239 hearing before the magistrate from the Second Judicial Circuit. 240 Any such request must be made within 30 days after the notice of 241 payment due is transmitted to the blogger. The office shall 242 transmit all such timely, written requests to the chief judge of 243 the Second Judicial Circuit along with the evidence the office 244 relied on in assessing the fine. The magistrate, after holding a 245 hearing, shall render a final order, upholding the fine or 246 waiving it in full or in part. 247 (f) A blogger may request that the filing of a report be 248 waived upon good cause shown based on reasonable circumstances. 249 The request must be filed with the office, which may grant or 250 deny the request. 251 (g) Fines that remain unpaid for a period in excess of 100 252 days after final determination are eligible for recovery through 253 the courts of this state. 254 Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.
20 comments:
Well, that's ridiculous. I don't get any compensation for anything on my blog, so I guess I'm safe until they fine the bejabbles out of me for Lord knows what.
It would be a much less obnoxious bill, although still obnoxious, if they just said you had to make note of any compensated post, not just political ones (and the political ones for only office holders at that).
At any rate, I'm pretty sure that in America you can insult governors to your heart's content.
And people wonder why I don't trust DeSantis.
Let's see: Legislative session in Florida ends the last day of March IRRC. The bill has no co-sponsors, has not been brought out for discussion, has no counterpart bill in the House.
I am pretty sure this baby died right after introduction.
So, if I get paid to blog about DeSantis, I have to register with the state.
Cool. My sister will gladly pay me a nickel a post to do that.
There was also a bill to disqualify any Political Party that had supported slavery in its party platform in the past from participating in Florida Elections. It's the same thing as this.
This will never go anywhere. Don’t get excited about an idiot’s crazy idea.
I am not registering shit.
On second thought, I know what this is. This is a Republican making the point that registering speech is no less an infringement than registering firearms.
Divemedic,
I think you're onto something. I wondered if it was a bill making a statement, but didn't make that connection.
Huh... Good to hear you're up and running BP... Wifey and I both send regards and love to you and TQOTW. We're both heartbroken about that big Gallumph Vulfgang LOL... Best Heaping pile of Loving Dawgmeat out there... Anywho... good points in the article.
We NEED to do a Face to Face when I get home on our next Visit...
BTW: Sapper is -pissed- that he wasn't included last Time
FYI... but yeah, Mid-to-Late March... PM me... let me know... Much Love from your other Fam,
The BCE Klan
Not worried really. Too much BS in it to get anywhere. Signaling at best.
I'm not a lawyer, don't play one on TV, and didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
That said, that bill sounds unconstitutional as hell.
It's either the Mother Of All Trolls (and one helluva good joke), or some Commie Libtards' Wet Dream.
It's prima facie moot, and bag-of-hammers stupidly unconstitutional, but the author(s) should be named, and the purpose uncovered (see above) before twisting your jangly bits inside your underpants.
Anybody serious about passing this, or in support of it, should be doxxed aggressively, and then let the games begin.
And BTW, if this somehow passes, and is signed, there went DeSantis' candidacy for anything, including dog catcher.
Just in case anyone was wondering.
Killing it, OTOH, could simply be a yuuuuuge softball to crank over the fence come primary season.
Ponder that.
There are no coincidences in politics.
None.
Part of the charm of Florida state politics is the high quality of trolling that goes on.
- Borepatch
Didn't Chicago or Illinois try this a couple of years ago and had it shot down quickly in court?
...The time for pirate radio has returned...
Has the First Amendment become null and void in Florida? I do not know what if any hand Governor DeSantis has in this, but he and his handlers should consider just what the reaction will be from the Conservative voters he hopes will support him in his Presidential endeavors.
Effing morons!
Aesop nailed it. 'No such thing as coincidence'... Trolling it, maybe...
My guess is that it's a political statement and nothing more. It's entirely unconstitutional, so even if the Florida legislature passed it (and they wouldn't), it would be overturned by SCOTUS in a blink.
I also doubt this has anything to do with DeSantis. My guess is that this is a politician, as suggested, either making a statement about gun registration, or alternatively, it's a dem that proposed it so that the complicit media can make hay over "fascist DeSantis" wanting to stifle free speech or something, because they would never actually report on who proposed it, they'd just say "Florida legislature" proposed bill outlawing criticism of governor... etc.
Post a Comment