Friday, January 13, 2023

Heh


 Stolen from Comrade Misfit.

14 comments:

Michael said...

The sad part is it might not be too far from the truth.

Eric Wilner said...

If that image conjures auditory memories, your age is showing.

JaimeInTexas said...

EW: :P

bj32097 said...

Because 1200 baud is nice and slow...

ASM826 said...

As long as it transmits faster than you can type, it will keep up fine.

Eric Wilner said...

Unknown: 1200 Baud? I was thinking 110, maybe 300. Were 1200 Baud acoustic couplers ever a thing?
(A true telco geek would recognize the model from the low-res photo, but I'm not that geek.)

LindaG said...

300 baud as you listen to the squeal and hope it connects.

BobF said...

And in the era of watching the printer type across the greenbar paper and you knew the rest of the sentence before it was printed.

Old NFO said...

Not far from the truth... That is an Anderson Jacobson A211 300 baud coupler. I know, I had one back in the day. It actually worked!!!

Eric Wilner said...

I had a friend in high school who had one of the really old-school acoustic couplers (in the wooden box, as I recall).
My first modem was a U.S. Robotics 300 Baud under-phone unit, with RJ-11 passthrough. Lasted a few years before 1200 Baud became a thing.
(One of these days, I should try to recover some files off of hard-sectored 8" floppies. And maybe some 800 BPI magtapes. Just out of historical interest, and as a reminder of things I was doing in the late 70s through mid 80s.)

chipmunk said...

Shoot, I'm so old I remember being excited about 900 baud....

blogger said...

You guys are the best!

And ASM826, I had a boss once who used those exact words to me when he turned down my request for a 2400 baud modem ...

- Borepatch

Flugelman said...

I well remember my teen aged daughter's wails as I tied up the phone to connect to the PDP-11 at work.

Aesop said...

Genius.