The problem is that while this post was spot on that he was unready to govern, that likely wasn't ever his intent. He meant to rule, which means that most of the "failures" described in the old post are irrelevant to him. As a matter of fact, failures were likely seen as yet another opportunity to make a crisis, to divide the country, and to blame his enemies. Never let a crisis go to waste, after all.
The country has roused itself, for better or worse. How it plays out we shall have to see, but this original post gave him rather the benefit of the doubt. I will update it appropriately now that we see behind the mask, but this is the yin to the upcoming post's yang.
----------------- snip snip --------------------
Unready
A story this old only survives if it speaks to something deep in the soul of the people of the time. What spoke to them was how Britnoth's hearth companions - his bodyguard, his huskarls - fought to the death over their slain lord's body. Despite the victory, the Viking army was so mauled that it sailed for home. People remembered their sacrifice because it stood in stark contrast to the cowardly actions of the king.
The 970s were the high water mark of the Anglo-Saxon empire. King Edgar was overlord - Emperor, really - of lesser kings in a united Britain. The realm was powerful, feared, and so at peace.
Until Ethelred the Unready. Coming to the throne as a boy in 979 when his brother Edward was murdered, he had to rely on advisers to defend his kingdom during the 980s. It was a brutal era, and it didn't take long for predictors to start stalking the weakened kingdom.
Ethelred means "noble counsel", from the root raed (council, advice). The Anglo-Saxons were great lovers of puns, and it was gallows humor that gave his nickname: unraed - "no council" - from which we get Unready.
Ethelred! Ethelred!Ethelred couldn't make up his mind - he couldn't formulate a plan and stick to it. And so he dithered: strong for a time until he met some minor difficulty, then weak when he could have pressed his enemies and won. They smelled blood, and what had started in the 970s as small plunder raids turned into all out invasions by Viking armies intent on inflicting the maximum damage possible.
Spent his royal life in bed;
one shoe off and one shoe on,
greatly loved by everyone.
They were after Danegeld - a ransom for them to go away. Rather than doing their own plundering, they got Ethelred to do it for them: collect taxes to pay them off. The problem, of course is well known. Once you pay the Danegeld, you never get rid of the Dane. Ethelred found the price kept rising: 10,000 pounds (992), 16,000 (994), 24,000 (1002), 36,000 (1007), 48,000 (1012). At this point, the Vikings wanted the whole prize, and Ethelred had to flee to France the next year.
His cruelty - such as his order to kill all male Danes in his kingdom in 1002 - was something his people could tolerate; indeed, it was a cruel time. His fecklessness was a different story, because he couldn't provide what all leaders must: victory. He couldn't win. Coming to the throne too young, he never learned how to lead.
We're seeing this today, in the Oval Office. The Obama administration is long on promises, but short on victories. They rammed the "stimulus" through Congress (we can blame the Bush administration for the Bank bailout), but since then their agenda has stalled. Cap and Trade is languishing in committee, unlikely to pass. His Health care plan is a shambles, with five competing plans and a fragmented Democratic party that smells defeat in the 2010 elections. We see the echo of Ethelred here: no mandate to buy insurance (candidate Obama), a mandate that people must buy it (today), a required "public option" (April), no required public option (today).
His foreign policy is a disaster: retreat from the Russians (no missile defense in eastern Europe), no sanctions for Iran (even the French are disgusted), retreat from victory in Afghanistan, unable to convince the International Olympic Committee to pick Chicago.
The more people see him - at home and abroad - the less they fear him. Like Ethelred, he may have a ruthless streak, but in October - what should be the high water mark of his power and influence - he seems unready. He thinks too highly of himself but he doesn't know how to accomplish his goals, he keeps changing his goals, his enemies are increasingly confident, and he surrounds himself with unraed - bad council.
We've seen this story before, and it doesn't end well.
þa wearð afeallen þæs folces ealdor, Æþelredes eorl;
Britnoth's headless body was brought back to Ely Cathedral, where he lies to this day. On his tomb is carved BRITHNOTHUS, NORTHUMBRIORUM DUX, PRAELIO CAESUS A DANIS A.D. DCCCCXCI. "Britnoth, Duke of Northumbria. He fell in battle against the Danes in the Year of Our Lord 991".
Sacrificed by a feckless leader. May we fare better.
'Divide and conquer' works like a hot damn...for awhile. As a Canadian watching the gong show down south it looks to me like your political right is fractured between the hard right conservatives and the libertarians.
ReplyDeleteIt is my scholarly opinion that if you had to slap a number on it, the two parties probably will agree on 95% of the issues. It is that 5% that has them at each others' throats and has Obutthole cackling in glee. We had the same problem up here in Canada for decades between our Conservatives and Reform Parties.
You guys have some thinking to do. Would it better to patch things up and negotiate concessions with each other - or let the Donks call the shots?
Take your time on that, though. No rush, deficit spending has only increased 400% since this idiot took office...and it looks like you are finally going to get to see what is in the Obamacare bill...
Historically speaking, few politicians - or rulers - know diddle about history, and/or its application to the present. Mr. obama, on the other hand, may well know something about the history of expensive golf clubs.
ReplyDelete