tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6322916946732811685.post7500762674595838533..comments2024-03-29T09:14:34.373-04:00Comments on Borepatch: A Modest (Scientific) Proposal*Borepatchhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05029434172945099693noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6322916946732811685.post-18482940814365806652012-06-27T20:04:13.637-04:002012-06-27T20:04:13.637-04:00Of course, the government won't ever do this. ...Of course, the government won't ever do this. But a privately funded "Climate prize" seems like it might be possible.Borepatchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05029434172945099693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6322916946732811685.post-12175132155574984722012-06-27T19:53:06.162-04:002012-06-27T19:53:06.162-04:00Pournelle suggests similar. But that fact that yo...Pournelle suggests similar. But that fact that you need to propose this to promote the very essence of the scientific method merely amplifies the assertion that the CAGW crowd are merely pursuing an agenda..."the science is settled" is anathema to science itself.Differhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15581662615586346808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6322916946732811685.post-20821522844271357892012-06-27T16:04:29.716-04:002012-06-27T16:04:29.716-04:00"Allocate $20M a year for 5 years to scientis...<i>"Allocate $20M a year for 5 years to scientists who can falsify the current thinking on Global Warming."</i><br /><br />This. It should be standard <i>required</i> practice for any .gov funded research to spend at least an equal amount on research intended to falsify the findings of the original research.Jake (formerly Riposte3)https://www.blogger.com/profile/02976718318892210404noreply@blogger.com