tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6322916946732811685.post2016025760344105170..comments2024-03-28T16:31:54.494-04:00Comments on Borepatch: The Unauthorized history of America's CentennialBorepatchhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05029434172945099693noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6322916946732811685.post-18058046053856051742019-06-25T19:49:59.211-04:002019-06-25T19:49:59.211-04:00Don't get me started.Don't get me started.waepnedmannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07114411043832799988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6322916946732811685.post-14260135117820034112019-06-25T13:08:39.235-04:002019-06-25T13:08:39.235-04:00The PDF of this can be downloaded for free. I brow...The PDF of this can be downloaded for free. I browsed through some of it. Not surprising to say the least.<br /><br />https://www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-Philadelphia-Broken-Covenant-Constitution/dp/1936577070<br /><br />On May 25th, 1787, a group of 55 men gathered for a closed meeting in Philadelphia. Officially, it was being convened to discuss alterations to the then constitution of the United States of America: the Articles of Confederation. Some state legislatures had authorized their representatives to attend the meeting only on this basis, explicitly prohibiting them from considering a new constitution. To make certain that the general public did not find out about the nature of this conspiracy, the convention members swore an oath not to discuss any proceedings with the public...for the rest of their lives. The only first-hand accounts of the proceedings were published several years later after the death of the last survivor, James Madison, in 1836. The press was forbidden to attend. The meetings were held on the second floor of the building, so that would-be eavesdroppers could not hear anything. The new constitution would become the law of the land whenever nine state conventions ratified it. This was in explicit violation of the Articles, which required a unanimous vote for amendments. Thus did a group of men launch a coup-d'etat. This coup established a new national covenant in 1788, a covenant stripped of the Articles' invocation of God, "The Great Governor of the World," with only the old country's name transferred for public relations' sake: the United States of America. Today, we would call this a trademark violation. But it worked. In this new book from NiceneCouncil.com Conspiracy in Philadelphia: The Broken Covenant of the U.S. Constitution Dr. Gary North, in nearly five hundred pages with thousands of footnotes rehearses the story of the deeply theological origins and implications of that coup against the God of the Bible and His people, the Church of the Lord Jesus!The Lab Managerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17314871529571094106noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6322916946732811685.post-49572429298642668962019-06-25T11:27:15.705-04:002019-06-25T11:27:15.705-04:00today's Democrats simply don't seem to kno...<i> today's Democrats simply don't seem to know that it was their party (and not the Republicans) who kept the Coloreds in their place. </i><br /><br />The Approved Narrative is that the Republicans and Democrats "switched sides". Some Dems will admit that the KKK was a Democrat Party organization, but insist that they switched sides in the early 20th century. I don't know of any objective evidence for that, but they're not big on actual documentation, “cause and effect” or any of that “merit” and “achievement” stuff which are male, white supremacist ideas, used to ensure the unfair dominance of white men. <br /><br />As for corruption and cronyism in government being the norm, that goes back farther than the Roman Empire. <br /><br />SiGraybeardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00280583031339062059noreply@blogger.com