As a matter of fact, it boils down to three stations that are used to "infill" data to the bulk of the continent. There's quite some interesting adjustments being made to the data from those stations:
As we so often see, older temperatures are adjusted downwards and recent temperatures are adjusted upwards:
Other than that, it's awesome.So we find that a large chunk of [NASA's] hottest year is centred around a large chunk of South America, where there is little actual data, and where the data that does exist has been adjusted out of all relation to reality.
Not to mention the margin of error on their little experiment was about 5 times greater than the "measured" temperature increase.
ReplyDeleteNasa claimed, wait for it, a 30% certainty that their analysis was correct.
These are not the same guys that sent men to the moon with less computing power than my cell phone.